Translation, cultural refinement, content re-validation & application of OTAS and METEOR instruments in Turkish operating rooms: An observational study

dc.authorscopusid56557005000
dc.authorscopusid35767832000
dc.authorscopusid46861367700
dc.authorscopusid35293409500
dc.authorscopusid55979875100
dc.authorscopusid56037630800
dc.authorscopusid37095337000
dc.contributor.authorÖnler, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorHull, Louise
dc.contributor.authorRuss, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorSevdalis, Nick
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Tülin
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:12:32Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentYüksekokullar, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Hemşirelik Bölümü
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, content validate, and test the reliability of The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS) and the Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room (METEOR) in Turkish operating rooms (ORs). Methods: This study used an observational design. After translation of OTAS and METEOR in Turkish, 22 OR experts rated the degree to which each OTAS and METEOR items contributes to teamwork, patient safety, and efficiency. Afterward, real-time observations were conducted using both tools in 20 elective general surgeries to evaluate feasibility of use and reliability of scoring. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate reliability. Results: OR experts deemed all OTAS and METEOR items to be content valid. Perfect, very good, and good interobserver agreement were found for 75.4% of OTAS and 86.25% of METEOR items (kappa coefficient ? 0.61). Interrater reliability of OTAS ratings ranged from 0.43 to 0.80. The surgical team's OTAS scores were significantly lower than the nursing and anesthetic teams, while the anesthetic team's scores were significantly higher than the nursing team's scores (p < 0.05). The preoperative OTAS scores were statistically higher than the intraoperative and postoperative scores, while the intraoperative scores were significantly higher than the postoperative scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OTAS and METEOR are content valid tools that are feasible to use reliably in Turkish ORs. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
dc.description.sponsorshipMAJ120902; King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: 1116485; Maudsley Charity; Economic and Social Research Council, ESRC: ES/P008313/1; National Institute for Health Research, NIHR: KMRF-2016-05-007; King's College London; King's Health Partners; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
dc.description.sponsorshipRuss is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Fellowship (grant: KMRF-2016-05-007 ). Hull and Sevdalis’ research is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (grant: 1116485). Hull and Sevdalis are also funded by King's Improvement Science (grant: MAJ120902), which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and comprises a specialist team of improvement scientists and senior researchers based at King's College London. Its work is funded by King's Health Partners (Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), Guy's and St Thomas’ Charity and the Maudsley Charity. Sevdalis’ research is further supported by the Economic and Social Research Council ASPIRES project grant ES/P008313/1 . The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the ESRC, the charities, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
dc.description.sponsorshipRuss is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Fellowship (grant: KMRF-2016-05-007). Hull and Sevdalis? research is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (grant: 1116485). Hull and Sevdalis are also funded by King's Improvement Science (grant: MAJ120902), which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and comprises a specialist team of improvement scientists and senior researchers based at King's College London. Its work is funded by King's Health Partners (Guy's and St Thomas? NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), Guy's and St Thomas? Charity and the Maudsley Charity. Sevdalis? research is further supported by the Economic and Social Research Council ASPIRES project grantES/P008313/1. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the ESRC, the charities, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pcorm.2020.100104
dc.identifier.issn2405-6030
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084494351
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2020.100104
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/5594
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorÖnler, Ebru
dc.institutionauthorYıldız, Tülin
dc.institutionauthorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.institutionauthorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPerioperative Care and Operating Room Management
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectOperating room
dc.subjectPatient safety
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectTeamwork
dc.titleTranslation, cultural refinement, content re-validation & application of OTAS and METEOR instruments in Turkish operating rooms: An observational study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
5594.pdf
Boyut:
416.65 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text