Modification of the Penman method for computing bare soil evaporation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid7801416172
dc.authorwosidkonukcu, fatih/ABA-9004-2020
dc.contributor.authorKonukçu, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:45:31Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe Penman equation, which calculates potential evaporation, was modified by Staple (1974, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38: 837) to include in it the relative vapour pressure h, of an unsaturated soil to predict actual evaporation from a soil surface. This improved the prediction when the difference between the temperature of the soil surface and ambient air is relatively small. The objectives of this study were (i) to revise it further using the actual temperature of the soil surface and air to provide the upper boundary condition in computing evaporative flux from the soil surface and (ii) to determine the range of water content for which the modified form of the Penman equation is applicable. The method adopted was tested by a series of outdoor experiments with a clay soil. The method of Staple (1974) overestimated the rate of evaporation above the water content 0.14 m(3) m(-3) (up to 30% deviation), whereas the new method agreed well with the measured rates (maximum 7% deviation). Below 0.14 m(3) m(-3) water content, both methods underestimated, but the Staple (1974) method deviated more from the measured values: the deviations were above 70% and around 30% for the Staple (1974) and the new methods respectively. Although the new method provided accurate solutions for a wider range of water content from saturation to the lower limit of the liquid phase of a particular soil, the modification did not respond to the vapour phase of the soil moisture. Therefore, in the dry range (i.e. in the vapour phase in which the flow was entirely as vapour), either resistance models or a Fickian equation should be used. Although the effect of salinity on the measured rates was significant, the model erroneously calculated the same rates for both saline and non-saline conditions. The effect of soil texture can easily be accounted by defining appropriate matric potential water content psi(m)(theta) and soil relative humidity water content h(s)(theta) relationships. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hyp.6553
dc.identifier.endpage3634
dc.identifier.issn0885-6087
dc.identifier.issue26en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-37549063976
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage3627
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6553
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10066
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000252167600008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorKonukçu, Fatih
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofHydrological Processes
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectdrying soil
dc.subjectsalinity
dc.subjectwater content
dc.subjectsoil relative humidity
dc.subjectvapour pressure
dc.subjectSimple Sensors
dc.subjectLiquid-Phase
dc.subjectWater-Table
dc.subjectMoisture
dc.subjectSurface
dc.subjectSalinity
dc.subjectAtmosphere
dc.subjectResistance
dc.subjectTransition
dc.subjectRadiation
dc.titleModification of the Penman method for computing bare soil evaporation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
10066.pdf
Boyut:
158.95 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ziraat Fakültesi Koleksiyonu