Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-5525-8696
dc.authorwosidGEMICI, AYSEGUL AKDOGAN/AAJ-2686-2021
dc.authorwosidOzmen, Vahit/AAE-3904-2020
dc.authorwosidGurdal, Sibel Ozkan/ABA-3882-2020
dc.authorwosidCabıoğlu, Neslihan/AAZ-1196-2020
dc.authorwosidAribal, Erkin/X-6448-2018
dc.contributor.authorGemici, Ayşegül Akdogan
dc.contributor.authorArıbal, Erkin
dc.contributor.authorÖzaydın, Ayşe Nilüfer
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.contributor.authorÖzçınar, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorCabıoğlu, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, Vahit
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:34:59Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to compare visual and quantitative measurements of breast density and to reveal the density profile with compression characteristics. Materials and Methods: Screening mammograms of 1399 women between May 2014 and May 2015 were evaluated by using Volpara 4th and 5th version. First 379 mammograms were assessed according to ACR BI-RODS 4th- edition and compared to Volpara. We categorized the breast density in two subgroups as dens or non-dens. Two radiologists reviewed the images in consensus. Agreement level between visual and volumetric methods and volumetric methods between themselves assessed using weighted kappa statistics. Volpara data such as fibroglandular volume (FGV), breast volume (BV), compression thickness (CT), compression force (CF), compression pressure (CP) were also analyzed with relation to the age. Results: 1399 mammograms were distributed as follows: 12.7% VDG1, 39.3% VDG2, 34.1% VDG3, 13.9% VDG4 according to the 4th edition of Volpara; 1.2% VDC1, 46% VDG2, 36.8% VDG3, 15.9% VDG4 according to the 5 -5 edition of Volpara. The difference between two editions was 4.7% increase in dense cat. -gory. 379 mammograms, according to ACR BI-BADS 4th edition, were distributed as follows: 25.9% category A, 50.9% category B, 19.8% category C, 3.4% category D. The strength of agreement between the Volpara 4th and 5th editions was found substantial (k= 0.726). The agreements between visual assessment and both Volpara editions were poor (k=- 0.413, k-0.399 respectively). There was a 142% increase in dense group with the VDG 4th edition and 162% with the VDG 5th edition when compared to visual assessment. Compression force decreased while compression pressure increased with incasing Volpara Density Grade (VDG) (p for trend <0.001 for both). Compression thickness and breast volume decreased with increasing VDG (p for trend <0.001 for both).The FGV decreases with age and the breast volume increases with increasing age (p<0.001). Conclusion: Visual assessment of breast density doesn't correlate well with volumetric assessments. Obtaining additional information about physical parameters and breast profile by the results of quantified methods is important for breast cancer risk assessments and prevention strategies.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/ejbh.2020.4943
dc.identifier.endpage116
dc.identifier.issn2587-0831
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135259200
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage110
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2020.4943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8163
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000524026100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Yayincilik
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Breast Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBI-RADS
dc.subjectBreast density
dc.subjectmammography
dc.subjectscreening
dc.subjectVolpara
dc.subject5th Edition
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.titleComparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8163.pdf
Boyut:
540.41 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu