GRAMMAR AND POWER IN WITTGENSTEIN AND FOUCAULT

dc.contributor.authorÖz, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T17:50:04Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T17:50:04Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentTekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractFoucault criticizes modern discourses on power such as Marxism, Freudianism, and liberalism in which power is understood as a repressive negative force that radiates from modern political institutions to the whole society from above. For him, modern power, with the involvement of the discourses of the humanities, sustains and maintains itself by producing subjectivities and the modern subject is simultaneously an object of knowledge and of domination. There are philosophically significant similarities between the ways Wittgenstein describes language games and grammar as formative elements of our sociality and Foucault’s understanding of power as a productive and dynamic grid of strategic formative relations. From this perspective, Peter Winch’s and David Bloor’s accounts of social constructive interpretations of Wittgenstein are analyzed and criticized, then a Wittgensteinian interpretation of the concepts of the crime and the criminal is presented on the basis of Arnold I. Davidson’s and Ian Hacking’s arguments on historical ontology.
dc.identifier.doi10.20304/ humanitas.595033
dc.identifier.endpage436
dc.identifier.issn2147-088X
dc.identifier.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.startpage423
dc.identifier.trdizinid377768
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20304/ humanitas.595033
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/377768
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/12750
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofHumanitas - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleGRAMMAR AND POWER IN WITTGENSTEIN AND FOUCAULT
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar