Evapotranspiration and the response of cool-season and warm-season turfgrass species to deficit irrigation under a sprinkler irrigation method

dc.authoridORTA, Abdul Halim/0000-0002-8262-9173
dc.contributor.authorOrta, A. Halim
dc.contributor.authorKuyumcu, Seray
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-06T17:23:38Z
dc.date.available2023-05-06T17:23:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of deficit irrigation applications at different levels on cool-season and warm-season turf irrigated by a sprinkler irrigation method. Field experiments were conducted in Istanbul, Turkey (41 & DEG;03MODIFIER LETTER PRIMEN; 28 & DEG;00MODIFIER LETTER PRIMEE; 46 m above sea level) during the growing season of 2019. In the study, two different turf types: a cool-season turfgrass mixture (C) and a warm-season turfgrass or Bermudagrass (W) were subjected to three different irrigation levels (I-1: Full irrigation, I-2: 1/3 deficiency, I-3: 2/3 deficiency) and examined in split-plots via a randomized complete block design conducted in triplicate. The soil moisture level was monitored via time-domain reflectometry (TDR) each day to provide irrigation timing. Unfortunately, none of the treatments were adequate to keep cool-season turf green after July because of a high MAD (Management Allowable Deficit) value. In the first 3-month period (May to July) of the experiment, during which both types of turf could survive, the seasonal evapotranspiration and the total amount of irrigation water applied were 11% more for the cool-season turf than for the warm-season turf. In the warm-season turf, although all irrigation levels provided for plant survival, the I-2 treatment is suggested when all quality parameters, such as the amount of irrigation water applied, the water used, the irrigation water-use efficiency and the quality parameters are evaluated together. Seasonal average values for Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) were calculated for the different irrigation treatments ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 for cool-season turf and from 0.52 to 0.66 for warm-season turf. The average CWSI values before irrigation was applied were from 0.68 to 0.79 for cool-season turf and from 0.69 to 0.79 for warm-season turf. The Jensen-Haise method (JH) was chosen as the best equation when reference evapotranspiration estimation methods were compared for both types of turf.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [119O088]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to acknowledge the funding support by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUEBITAK), under project registry number 119O088. The authors would also like to thank the staff and support from cooperators at Silivri-Istanbul Municipality.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00271-022-00833-8
dc.identifier.endpage91
dc.identifier.issn0342-7188
dc.identifier.issn1432-1319
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143497502
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage81
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00833-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/12212
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000896445300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorOrta, A. Halim
dc.institutionauthorKuyumcu, Seray
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofIrrigation Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectWater-Stress Index
dc.subjectTurf
dc.titleEvapotranspiration and the response of cool-season and warm-season turfgrass species to deficit irrigation under a sprinkler irrigation method
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
12212.pdf
Boyut:
1.58 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text