Preculture Antiseptic Cleaning in Women Patients; is it a Myth or a Scientific Fact?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-6140-5181
dc.authorscopusid8416588900
dc.authorscopusid6602366586
dc.authorscopusid55608201600
dc.authorscopusid57188868231
dc.authorscopusid35264829200
dc.authorwosidMalkoc, Ercan/AAJ-3012-2020
dc.authorwosidYazici, Cenk Murat/AAA-4330-2020
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.contributor.authorGülen, Dumrul
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Çağrı
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ayşe Demet
dc.contributor.authorMalkoç, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:14:07Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:14:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAim: Urine culture is one of the most common labaratory test in urology clinics. Contamination of urine cultures is a challenging problem that causes extra efforts for both clinical and economical aspects. Perineal antiseptic cleaning was thought to be an effective method to reduce contamination rates. In this prospective study, we tried to evaluate if antiseptic usage during perineal cleaning was able to decrease contamination rates in scientific manner or is it a myth of urology. Material and Method: A total of 150 female patients over 18 years old with the symptom of dysuria and/or frequency and had a minimum one positive leukocyte at urine dipstick test, were prospectively enrolled to the study. Two midstream clean-catch urine samples were given by the same patient at 6 hour intervals, one with sterile saline and other with antiseptic usage for perineal cleaning. All samples were incubated in microbiology laboratory for urine culture evaluation. Results: Median age of study population was 45.0 +/- 22 years old. Culture reports of the first urine samples were; 96(64%) sterile, 32(21,3%) contaminated and 22(14.7%) with significant bacterial growth. These results were 101(67.3%), 27(18%) and 22(14.7%) at cultures with antiseptic cleaning, respectively (p=0.62). Mean colony count of contaminated cultures in saline group was 88.8 +/- 63.9 whereas it was 50.7 +/- 37.6 in antiseptic group (p=0.02). Discussion: Perineal antiseptic cleaning did not significantly affect culture results. Significant bacterial growth and contamination rates did not differ between groups indicating that, antiseptic usage for perineal cleaning may not be warrant.
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.1385
dc.identifier.endpage376
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84900335037
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage374
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.1385
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/5788
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000215566500008
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.institutionauthorGülen, Dumrul
dc.institutionauthorDoğan, Çağrı
dc.institutionauthorKaya, Ayşe Demet
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDerman Medical Publ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectUrine Analysis
dc.subjectperineum
dc.subjectAnti-Infective Agents
dc.subjectCystitis
dc.subjectUrinary Tract Infections
dc.titlePreculture Antiseptic Cleaning in Women Patients; is it a Myth or a Scientific Fact?
dc.title.alternativeKadi{dotless}n hastalarda kültür öncesi antiseptik temizli?i; efsane mi, bilimsel gerçek mi?]
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5788.pdf
Boyut:
511.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu