The comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUzunlu, Osman
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorComut, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorAvci, Esin
dc.contributor.authorSenol, Hande
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T17:58:53Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T17:58:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentTekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This experimental comparative study was to evaluate the local effects of three different suture materials on inMETHODS: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Ethical Committee (E-60758568-020-176720). A prospective, experimental comparative analysis was conducted on 24 rats. They were divided into three equal groups; Group 1 underwent colonic anastomosis with Vicryl suture material, Group 2 underwent colonic anastomosis with polypropylene suture; and Group 3 underwent colonic anastomosis with polydioxanone (PDS) suture. The second operation underwent the 7th post-operative day. Adhesion score, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bursting pressure, hydroxyproline levels, and histopathologic examination were evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived, and no leakage, intestinal obstruction, or wound infection was observed during the experiment. The adhesion score was evaluated according to the Diamond classification and same in all groups. Median anastomotic bursting pressure was 125.75 mmHg (10-241) in the Vicryl group, 159.25 mmHg (113-190) in the polypropylene group, and 154.50 mmHg (20-212) in the PDS group. Hydroxyproline tissue concentrations were in the Vicryl group 1699.92 & PLUSMN;220.8 ng/mg (range: 1509.81-2186.47), in the polypropylene group 1126.24 & PLUSMN;607.12 ng/mg (range: 53.22-1815.63), and 1547.86 & PLUSMN;335.2 ng/mg (range: 973.66-1973.2) in PDS group. There was no difference among groups regarding the inflammatory response evaluated by histopathology. There was no statistical CONCLUSION: This experimental study demonstrates that suture materials did not worsen tissue healing during intestinal anastomosis. Absorbable, slowly-absorbable, and non-absorbable suture materials could be used safely in every situation.
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/tjtes.2023.86579
dc.identifier.endpage962
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issn1307-7945
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37681730
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170178158
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage956
dc.identifier.trdizinid1264537
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.86579
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1264537
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/14543
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001070452100002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecttestinal anastomosis healing.
dc.subjectAnastomotic healing
dc.subjectanastomotic leak
dc.subjectanimal experiments
dc.subjectsurgical anastomosis
dc.subjectsuture techniques.
dc.titleThe comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study
dc.title.alternativeThe comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu