Nutrient and Mineral Contents, and in vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and Mock Privet (Phillyrea latifolia L.)

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-4953-7960
dc.authorwosidESEN, Selim/ABA-3757-2020
dc.contributor.authorEseceli, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorAyasan, Tugay
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Fisun
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Vasfiye Kader
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:46:42Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to exhibit the importance of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and mock privet (Phillyrea latifolia L.) in the grazing system and animal feeding. For this purpose, the leaves of these two evergreen shrubs were harvested by hand-clipping in their early vegetative stages at Sarkoy, Tekirdag, Turkey, in April 2019. The nutrient and mineral contents and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak and mock privet was determined by using in vitro gas production technique. In this study, it was found that there was a statistically significant difference between the kermes oak and mock privet in terms of the contents of dry matter, crude ash, crude cellulose, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin, and the minerals of zinc, copper, iron, and potassium (p<0.05). Furthermore, it has been observed that these two shrub plants yielded different values in terms of metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility (p<0.05). In this study, the time-dependent mean gas production of the two evergreen shrubs was found to be significant at all times except the 96th hour; and gas production kinetics made a significant difference in b, the volume of the gas production from slowly fermentable (p<0.05). The volume of the gas production from slowly fermentable (b) was found to be higher in the mock privet than the kermes oak. Results derived from this study indicate that even the differences between the kermes oak and mock privet in terms of nutrient and mineral contents, both shrubs might be used more adequately as an alternative feed source during the grazing season where they are widely distributed.
dc.identifier.doi10.47059/alinteri/V35I2/AJAS20080
dc.identifier.endpage106
dc.identifier.issn2564-7814
dc.identifier.issn2587-2249
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage100
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/V35I2/AJAS20080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10349
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000625102800013
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorKoç, Fisun
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAdem Yavuz Sonmez
dc.relation.ispartofAlinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectKermes oak
dc.subjectMock privet
dc.subjectNutrient content
dc.subjectMineral content
dc.subjectIn vitro gas production
dc.subjectNutritional Quality
dc.subjectYield
dc.titleNutrient and Mineral Contents, and in vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and Mock Privet (Phillyrea latifolia L.)
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10349.pdf
Boyut:
245.25 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ziraat Fakültesi Koleksiyonu