Is the ecological footprint related to the Kuznets curve a real process or rationalizing the ecological consequences of the affluence? Evidence from PSTR approach

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-4762-9282
dc.authorid0000-0002-0398-9884
dc.authorid0000-0001-7552-7163
dc.authorscopusid56498675200
dc.authorscopusid55325345300
dc.authorscopusid25722917400
dc.authorwosidEsen, Ömer/E-8335-2015
dc.authorwosidAYDIN, Celil/AAE-3086-2020
dc.authorwosidAYDIN, Recai/ABH-1113-2020
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Celil
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Recai
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:33:43Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentFakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Maliye Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to empirically investigate the nonlinear effects of economic growth on ecological footprints as an indicator of environmental degradation. The sample consists of 26 European Union (EU) countries by covering the 1990-2013 period. We employ the recently developed panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) model, which can predict the threshold level endogenously. These ecological footprints are divided into those occurring on six major categories of ecologically productive areas, including cropland, grazing land, forest area, fishing grounds, built-up land, and carbon-absorption land. The empirical results indicate that environmental pressure tends to increase with economic development, but then does not decline with further growth for all the ecological footprints except the fishing grounds footprint (FGF). The empirical findings imply that the EKC hypothesis is a problematic phenomenon, at least in the case of the accumulation of stocks of waste, since the relationship between ecological footprint types (excluding the FGF) and economic development does not exhibit the inverted U-shaped pattern associated with the EKC hypothesis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.034
dc.identifier.endpage555
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.issn1872-7034
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056781532
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage543
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/7882
dc.identifier.volume98
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000464891100054
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorEsen, Ömer
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Indicators
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEnvironmental Kuznets curve
dc.subjectEcological footprint
dc.subjectEconomic growth
dc.subjectPanel smooth transition regression model
dc.subjectPollution Haven Hypothesis
dc.subjectCarbon-Dioxide Emissions
dc.subjectPanel-Data Analysis
dc.subjectEconomic-Growth
dc.subjectCo2 Emissions
dc.subjectEnvironmental Degradation
dc.subjectEnergy-Consumption
dc.subjectRenewable Energy
dc.subjectWater-Use
dc.subjectIncome
dc.titleIs the ecological footprint related to the Kuznets curve a real process or rationalizing the ecological consequences of the affluence? Evidence from PSTR approach
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
7882.pdf
Boyut:
1.73 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu