Evaluation of preoperative nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer using different nutritional screening tests

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57222575367
dc.authorscopusid57225753404
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aysel Şahin
dc.contributor.authorPekcan, G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:48:47Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentYüksekokullar, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground & Aims: To determine the nutritional status of gastrointestinal cancer patients with two different nutritional screening tools and compare the tools. Methods: This study was held in 110 patients (female; 41.8% male: 58.2%), aged 19-65 years, admitted to hospital, diagnosed with gastrointestinal system cancer (not operated). The objective was to determine the nutritional status of the patients with nutrition screening tools (Subjective Global Assessment-SGA, Nutritional Risk Screening-NRS 2002), compare the tools, and describe the malnutrition status of patients. Socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters and 24- hour dietary recalls, frequency of foods consumed were determined. Results: Out of total, 54.7% of males and 56.5% of females had normal Body Mass Index-BMI. Using SGA, 49.1% of the patients had serious, 41.8% had moderate degree of malnutrition. According to NRS-2002, percent-ages of severely, moderately and mildly undernourished patients were 54.6%, 33.6% and 11.8%, respectively. The percentage of patients meeting the recommended Daily allowances was 47.2% and 58.1%, respectively for males and females. According to NRS and SGA tools, statistically significant differences with current weight, ideal body weight, usual body weight, percentage of weight loss, body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST), mid-upper arm muscle area, mid-upper arm muscle circumference and mid-upper arm fat area (p<0.05) were found. Nutritional status of patients with SGA and NRS tests showed consistent similarity (?=0.671, p<0.001).Similar changes were found between SGA and NRS scores. Consistency was found statistically significant (r=0.786 and p=<0.001). Conclusion: One of the malnutrition screening tools could be preoperatively applied in gastrointestinal system cancer patients. Nutritional support should be planned and administered, when needed. © Mattioli 1885
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v22i4.9339
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103242257
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v22i4.9339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10684
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorKaya, Aysel Şahin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMattioli 1885
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Nutrition
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectGastrointestinal system cancers
dc.subjectNRS-2002
dc.subjectNutritional status
dc.subjectScreening tools
dc.subjectSGA
dc.subjectalpha tocopherol
dc.subjectascorbic acid
dc.subjectcalcium
dc.subjectcarbohydrate
dc.subjectcholesterol
dc.subjectfat
dc.subjectiron
dc.subjectmagnesium
dc.subjectphosphorus
dc.subjectpotassium
dc.subjectprotein
dc.subjectretinol
dc.subjectriboflavin
dc.subjectsodium
dc.subjectthiamine
dc.subjectzinc
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectanthropometric parameters
dc.subjectarm circumference
dc.subjectarm muscle
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbiochemical analysis
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectbody weight
dc.subjectbody weight loss
dc.subjectcaloric intake
dc.subjectclinical assessment tool
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdietary intake
dc.subjectdigestive system cancer
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfood intake
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectideal body weight
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmalnutrition
dc.subjectmeal skipping
dc.subjectnutrient intake
dc.subjectnutritional assessment
dc.subjectNutritional Risk Screening NRS 2002
dc.subjectnutritional status
dc.subjectscreening test
dc.subjectskinfold thickness
dc.subjectSubjective Global Assessment
dc.titleEvaluation of preoperative nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer using different nutritional screening tests
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Sağlık Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu