Comparison of visual acuity, refractive results and complications of femtosecond laser with mechanical microkeratome in LASIK

dc.authorid0000-0002-4018-9798
dc.authorscopusid6603443273
dc.authorscopusid34869701000
dc.authorscopusid14424557300
dc.authorscopusid8073283000
dc.authorwosidCosar, Cemile B/D-6634-2016
dc.contributor.authorCoşar, Cemile Banu
dc.contributor.authorGönen, Tansu
dc.contributor.authorMoray, Murat
dc.contributor.authorŞener, Asım Bozkurt
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:35:46Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:35:46Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a femtosecond laser (Femtec, Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH, Germany) versus a mechanical microkeratome (Hansatome, Bausch and Lomb, USA) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who had undergone LASIK using the 80 -kHz Femtec femtosecond laser were compared to age- and refraction-matched patients in whom the Hansatome microkeratome was used. Refractive and visual results 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 280 eyes were analyzed (140 in each group). At 3 months postoperatively in the Femtec vs Hansatome group, spherical equivalent refraction was within +/- 1.00D of emmetropia in 140 vs 138 eyes (P= 0.498), the cylinder was within +/- 0.50D in 137 vs 139 eyes (P=0.622), and the UDVA was 20/20 or better in 136 vs 137 eyes, (P =0.724), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P=0.099). CONCLUSION: LASIK performed both with Femtec femtosecond laser and Hansatome microkeratome achieved satisfactory refractive and visual results at 3 months postoperatively, without significant differences in efficacy, safety, and complication rates between the two procedures.
dc.identifier.doi10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.18
dc.identifier.endpage355
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959
dc.identifier.issn2227-4898
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23826532
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84894555297
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage350
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8211
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000320830300018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGönen, Tansu
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIjo Press
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectlaser in situ keratomileusis
dc.subjectfemtosecond laser
dc.subjectFemtec
dc.subjectmicrokeratome
dc.subjectHansatome
dc.subjectIn-Situ Keratomileusis
dc.subjectMyopia
dc.subjectFlap
dc.titleComparison of visual acuity, refractive results and complications of femtosecond laser with mechanical microkeratome in LASIK
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
8211.pdf
Boyut:
1.36 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text