The incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning

dc.authorscopusid8204207500
dc.authorscopusid16687052800
dc.authorscopusid24476202600
dc.authorscopusid6603880221
dc.authorscopusid6603616345
dc.authorscopusid7003401660
dc.authorscopusid6602701033
dc.authorwosidGurdal, Sibel Ozkan/ABA-3882-2020
dc.authorwosidOzmen, Vahit/AAE-3904-2020
dc.authorwosidOzcinar, Beyza/AAF-3116-2020
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.contributor.authorÖzçınar, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorKayahan, Munire
dc.contributor.authorIğcı, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorTunaci, Mehtap
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, Vahit
dc.contributor.authorMuslumanoglu, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:34:53Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on preoperative or intraoperative surgical planning. One hundred and sixty females with breast cancer were enrolled in the study. The contribution of MRI compared to MMG and USG, their histopathological concordance, and their impact on surgical treatment were evaluated prospectively. In 48 (30.0%) of the patients, MRI identified suspicious lesions that were not detected by MMG and USG. The diagnosis by MRI was accurate in 17 (10.6%) of them, while in remaining 31 patients (19.4%) the additional lesions found by MRI and interpreted as malignant were found not to be malignant. The pathological accordance of MRI and MMG compared with USG were 69.3 and 70.0%, respectively, whereas individually, MMG and USG were in accordance with the pathological examination in 52.9 and 67.9% of the cases, respectively. Assessment of the tumor size, multifocality, multicentricity, and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ by MRI may lead to misinterpretations in the majority of patients. The surgical approach should not be changed based solely on MRI findings. An accurately interpreted MMG combined with USG may be sufficient in most cases.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00595-012-0137-5
dc.identifier.endpage61
dc.identifier.issn0941-1291
dc.identifier.issn1436-2813
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22294425
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871318176
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage55
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0137-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8131
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000312531800008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGürdal, Sibel Özkan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofSurgery Today
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectSurgical planning
dc.subjectContralateral Breast
dc.subjectSurgical-Management
dc.subjectConserving Therapy
dc.subjectPreoperative Mri
dc.subjectCancer
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectImpact
dc.subjectCarcinoma
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.titleThe incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
8131.pdf
Boyut:
191.93 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text