Does anterolateral ligament rupture affect functional outcomes in patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56421955000
dc.authorscopusid7003278840
dc.authorscopusid57196712908
dc.authorscopusid57207910280
dc.authorscopusid56576183700
dc.authorscopusid57207912477
dc.authorscopusid57207908663
dc.contributor.authorGünaydın, Burak
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, A.
dc.contributor.authorSarı, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Çağatay
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, B.E.
dc.contributor.authorKuşak, I.
dc.contributor.authorKabukçuoğlu, Yavuz Selim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:04:56Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:04:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractBackground: Studies have shown that the anterolateral ligament contributes to knee stability. This study aims to compare the results of postoperative physical examinations, knee joint stability tests, and functional assessment tests of patients with intact anterolateral (AL) ligaments and patients with ruptured anterolateral (AL) ligaments. Material and method: This study consisted of 101 patients, with at least a 12-month follow-up period, who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2010 and 2016, and whose AL ligaments were evaluated by the radiologist with the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI). Of these patients, 41 had intact AL ligament (Group 1) in MRI and other 60 had ruptured AL ligament (Group 2). Groups were compared according to postoperative physical examinations, knee joint stability tests, and functional assessment tests. Results: The average Lysholm score of Group 1 was 94.9 (range: 81–100), and the score of Group 2 was 87.2 (range: 74–100). The modified Cincinnati score of Group 1 was 28.7 (24–30), while the score of Group 2 was 25.6 (21–30). The average IKDC subjective knee evaluation score of Group 1 was 91.9 (range: 83–100), and the score of Group 2 was 86.6 (range: 75–100). The average thigh atrophy value was 1.5 centimeters (cm) in Group 1 and 2.4 cm in Group 2. Thirty-three patients in Group 1 were able to jump over 85% of the distance in single-legged hop test compared to the intact side, while 16 patients in Group 2 were able to jump over this distance successfully. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the Lysholm activity scoring results, the Modified Cincinnati scoring results, IKDC subjective knee evaluation results, two-cycle IKDC activity scale results, comparison of thigh diameters and one leg hop tests of two groups showed a statistically significant difference, and the results of the patients with intact AL ligaments who underwent an ACL reconstruction were found to be better (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in other examinations and tests. Conclusion: Since the rupture of the AL ligament has negative effects on functional outcomes, we think that the reconstruction of the AL ligament in the same session with the ACL reconstruction or later will have a positive effect on functional outcomes. © 2019 IJS Publishing Group Ltd
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.010
dc.identifier.endpage31
dc.identifier.issn1743-9191
dc.identifier.pmid30885836
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063198817
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage25
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/4841
dc.identifier.volume65
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000466781700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGünaydın, Burak
dc.institutionauthorSarı, Abdulkadir
dc.institutionauthorTekin, Çağatay
dc.institutionauthorKabukçuoğlu, Yavuz Selim
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligament
dc.subjectAnterolateral ligament
dc.subjectArthroscopic reconstruction
dc.subjectFunctional scoring of the knee
dc.subjectMRI
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament rupture
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectatrophy
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectclinical outcome
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjectfunctional assessment
dc.subjecthamstring tendon
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectknee
dc.subjectknee instability
dc.subjectleg
dc.subjectLysholm score
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical society
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal system
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal system parameters
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectorthopedic specialist
dc.subjectphysical examination
dc.subjectpostoperative care
dc.subjectpreoperative care
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectrange of motion
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subjectsports medicine
dc.subjectthigh
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
dc.subjectinjuries
dc.subjectjoint ligament
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectrupture
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKnee Joint
dc.subjectLigaments, Articular
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectRupture
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleDoes anterolateral ligament rupture affect functional outcomes in patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4839.pdf
Boyut:
3.71 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu