Effect of Voiding Position on Uroflowmetric Parameters in Healthy and Obstructed Male Patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-6140-5181
dc.authorscopusid8416588900
dc.authorscopusid23052928300
dc.authorscopusid55608201600
dc.authorwosidYazici, Cenk Murat/AAA-4330-2020
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.contributor.authorTürker, Polat
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Çağrı
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:36:57Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:36:57Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Uroflowmetry is frequently used and simple urodynamic test, but it may be affected by various factors. Voiding position is one of the factors that can change the results. We tried to compare the uroflowmetric parameters in sitting and standing positions during urination. Material and Methods: A total of 198 patients were enrolled to the study. All patients underwent an uroflowmetry in standing and sitting position at late afternoon (2-4 PM) of two corresponding days with a gravimetric uroflowmeter (Uroscan, Aymed, Turkey). A transabdominal ultrasonography was used to evaluate post voiding residue (PVR). All uroflowmetric parameters and PVR. were compared with paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The median age of study population was 58.0 (36-69) years. There was no statistically significant difference at voided volume of patients in standing and sitting position as it was 271.5 +/- 81.8 mL and 274.8 +/- 82.4 mL, respectively (P = .505). Mean maximum flow rate (Qmax) during urination at standing position was 15.3 +/- 6.7 mL/s while it was 15.0 +/- 7.0 mL/s at sitting position (P = .29). Mean average flow rate in standing position was 8.60 +/- 4.0 mL/s and 8.25 +/- 3.8 mL/s in sitting position (P = .054). There was a statistically significant difference between the median post-voiding residues in standing and sitting urination which was 29.5 (0-257) mL in standing and 47.5 (2-209) mL in sitting position (P < .0001). Other uroflowmetric parameters (time to maximum flow and voiding time) was not statistically different between groups. Conclusion: There are no clinically important uroflowmetric differences between voiding in sitting and standing positions so voiding position may be left to personal preferences during uroflowmetric evaluation.
dc.identifier.endpage1113
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24469658
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84892531239
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1106
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8498
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000329142800017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorYazıcı, Cenk Murat
dc.institutionauthorTürker, Polat
dc.institutionauthorDoğan, Çağrı
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrc
dc.relation.ispartofUrology Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjecturination disorders
dc.subjecturodynamics
dc.subjectpredictive value of tests
dc.subjectposture
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectFlow
dc.subjectMen
dc.subjectModel
dc.titleEffect of Voiding Position on Uroflowmetric Parameters in Healthy and Obstructed Male Patients
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
8498.pdf
Boyut:
405.61 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu