Reliability of information in YouTube™ videos on types of root resorption and related stimulating factors

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCagay Sevencan, Gulcin/0000-0002-8486-4572
dc.contributor.authorSevencan, Gulcin Cagay
dc.contributor.authorErener, Hande
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T17:58:44Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T17:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentTekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aim Root resorption occurs for various reasons and can also be seen as a treatment complication in orthodontics. This study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of YouTube (TM) videos on root resorption and to assess whether the videos referred to orthodontic treatment and other stimulation factors. Materials and Methods YouTube was searched using the keyword 'root resorption', which is the most searched term on Google Trends. The first 200 videos identified using the default filter 'sort by relevance' were used. Information such as the source, type, duration, and number of likes were recorded. Videos were analyzed using a 23-point content scale related to root resorption and divided into groups (poor, moderate, and excellent) based on the Global Quality Score. Results A total of 95 videos were included in the study. Most were uploaded by dentists or dental clinics (n = 64, 67.4%). The mean number of days since upload was 1536 +/- 1254, and the mean duration was 5 +/- 4 min. The videos had a mean of 80 +/- 515 likes and 7043 +/- 35,382 views, and a mean viewing rate of 1131.71 +/- 8736.83. The most discussed topic was radiographic signs of root resorption. While the highest content score for the videos was 21, the average score was only 4. The mean GQS was 2 +/- 1. Grouping videos by GQS showed that 55 (57.9%) were poor, 38 (40%) were moderate, and 2 (2.1%) were excellent. There was a significant relationship between videos that mentioned orthodontics (n = 62; 65.3%) and higher GQS (p = .036), and a significant difference was between GQS groups for total content levels (p < .001). Conclusions YouTube videos related to root resorption lack sufficient information and clarity, and their quality needs to be improved. Oral health professionals should strive to produce higher-quality videos.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/edt.12970
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657
dc.identifier.pmid38794913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194428718
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12970
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/14476
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001230685600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofDental Traumatology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectorthodontics
dc.subjectorthodontic treatment
dc.subjectroot resorption
dc.subjectsocial media
dc.subjectYouTube
dc.titleReliability of information in YouTube™ videos on types of root resorption and related stimulating factors
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu