Comparison of the Morphologic and Mechanical Features of Human Cranial Dura and Other Graft Materials Used for Duraplasty

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇavdar, Safiye
dc.contributor.authorSürücü, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Mazhar
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Büşra
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Anjum Naeem
dc.contributor.authorAydoğmuş, Evren
dc.contributor.authorTanış, Özgül
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T17:43:28Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T17:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to compare the thickness and mechanical properties of the frontal; parietal; temporal; occipital human dura; autogenous grafts (facia lata, temporal fascia, galea aponeurotica); and artificial dura. Methods: Sagittal and transverse dura samples were obtained from standard regions of the cranial dura from 30 autopsies for histologic and mechanical property measurements. Identical measurements were made for the autogenous grafts artificial dura, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results: The thickness of the temporal (0.35 ± 0.11 mm), parietal (0.44 ± 0.13 mm), frontal (0.38 ± 0.12 mm), and occipital (0.46 ± 0.18 mm) dura showed regional variations. The parietal and occipital dura were significantly thicker than the temporal dura. The occipital dura was considerably thicker than the frontal dura. The frontal and temporal dura of males were significantly thicker than females. The sagittal maximum tensile force measurements were significantly greater than transverse, for the frontal, temporal, and occipital dura. The stiffness measurements in sagittal direction were greater than the measurements in transverse direction for the frontal dura. The mechanical properties and thickness of the autogenous and artificial dura were not similar to the human dura. Conclusions: The thickness and mechanical properties of the regional cranial dura should be taken into consideration for a better cure and fewer complications. The mechanical properties of sagittal and transverse dura should be kept in mind for the preference of dura material. The present study's data can pave the way to produce artificial regional dura by mimicking the thickness and mechanical properties of the human dura. © 2021
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.029
dc.identifier.endpagee207
dc.identifier.issn1878-8750
dc.identifier.pmid34920156
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121930010
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpagee199
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/12396
dc.identifier.volume159
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Neurosurgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCranial regional dura
dc.subjectMechanical properties
dc.subjectThickness
dc.titleComparison of the Morphologic and Mechanical Features of Human Cranial Dura and Other Graft Materials Used for Duraplasty
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu