Trakya Bölgesi yaban domuzlarında kene enfestasyonu karakteristiğinin belirlenmesi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2018
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Yaban hayatının, hem evcil hayvanlar, hem de insanlar için birçok paraziter ve enfeksiyöz hastalığa kaynaklık edebildiği bildirilmistir. Bu noktada yaban domuzları ile ilgili olarak da oldukça iddialı bildirimler söz konusudur. Bu hayvan grubuna yönelik söz konusu itham, az sayıda da olsa doğrudan keneler için, çok sayıda da kene aracılı hastalık adına literatürde yerini almıstır. Öte yandan, yaban domuzları da dahil yaban hayatının, hastalıkların doğal dinamiğindeki rolü veya katkı payı çoğu etken için belirsizdir. Ayrıca, yaban domuzlarının, evcil domuzlara ve diğer birçok yaban hayvanına göre hastalıklara ve parazitlere karsı çok daha dirençli olduğu da bilinmektedir.Bu çalısmada; 01.05.2015- 01.05.2016 tarihleri arasında, Edirne ve Kırklareli kırsalındaki 18 odakta, gerekli yasal izni takiben avlanan 60 ve trafikte ölen 4 olmak üzere toplam 64 yaban domuzunda kene ve bit enfestasyonu takibi yapılmıstır. ?ncelemeler esasen kıs aylarında gerçeklestirilmis olup hayvanların 58’i Ekim-Subat ayları arasında incelenmistir.Taramalarda, Kasım ayında avlanan, 1,5 yasında erkek bir domuzda, 7 disi, 4 erkek Haemaphysalis inermis ve 1 disi, 4 erkek Haemaphysalis parvatespit edilmistir. Diğer domuzlarda keneye rastlanmamıstır. ?ncelemelerde, hayvanların 8’inde 42 ergin, 8 nimf olmak üzere 50 Haematopinus suis türü bit tespit edilmistir.Sonuç olarak; bölge evcil hayvanlarındaki bilinen kene yoğunluğu, çalısılan ayların bazı kene türleri ve bit için ideal olması durumu ve elde edilen enfestasyon düsüklüğübirlikte dikkate alındığında, yaban domuzlarının,en azından bölge özelinde ve en azından soğuk aylardaki kene populasyonu içinetkili bir destekleyici olmadığı sonucuna varılmıstır.
It has been reported that wildlife can be a source of many parasitic and infectious diseases for both domestic animals and humans. At this point, there are quite ambitious statements about wild boars. The allegation of this assertive source for this group of animals has taken place in the literature in a small number for the ticks, and a large number for tickborne pathogens. On the other hand, the role or contribution of wildlife, including wild boars, in natural dynamics of diseases is uncertain for most agents. Furthermore, wild boars are also known to be much more resistant to diseases and parasites than domestic pigs and many other wild animals.In this study; between 01.05.2015 - 01.05.2016, tick and louse infestations were investigated in a total of 64 wild boars, 60 of which were hunted following the legal permission and 4 of which were died in crash, in 18 localitiesin Edirne and Kırklareli. The observations were carried out mainly in the winter months and 58 of the animals were examined between October and February. In the survey, 7 female, 4 male Haemaphysalis inermisand 1 female, 4 male Haemaphysalis parva was found in a 1.5 year old male pig hunted in November. No ticks was detected in the other animals. In the investigations for the louse, 50 Haematopinus suis,42 mature and 8 nymph,were detected in 8 of the boars.As a conclusion, the well-known tick density of the livestock in the region and the fact that the working months are ideal for some species of ticks and lice, the recorded low infestation level of the wild boars in this study was interpreted as these animals are not an effectivesupportive factor for tick population, at least region-specific.
It has been reported that wildlife can be a source of many parasitic and infectious diseases for both domestic animals and humans. At this point, there are quite ambitious statements about wild boars. The allegation of this assertive source for this group of animals has taken place in the literature in a small number for the ticks, and a large number for tickborne pathogens. On the other hand, the role or contribution of wildlife, including wild boars, in natural dynamics of diseases is uncertain for most agents. Furthermore, wild boars are also known to be much more resistant to diseases and parasites than domestic pigs and many other wild animals.In this study; between 01.05.2015 - 01.05.2016, tick and louse infestations were investigated in a total of 64 wild boars, 60 of which were hunted following the legal permission and 4 of which were died in crash, in 18 localitiesin Edirne and Kırklareli. The observations were carried out mainly in the winter months and 58 of the animals were examined between October and February. In the survey, 7 female, 4 male Haemaphysalis inermisand 1 female, 4 male Haemaphysalis parva was found in a 1.5 year old male pig hunted in November. No ticks was detected in the other animals. In the investigations for the louse, 50 Haematopinus suis,42 mature and 8 nymph,were detected in 8 of the boars.As a conclusion, the well-known tick density of the livestock in the region and the fact that the working months are ideal for some species of ticks and lice, the recorded low infestation level of the wild boars in this study was interpreted as these animals are not an effectivesupportive factor for tick population, at least region-specific.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Yaban domuzu, Kene, Bit, Trakya, Wild boar, Tick, Louse, Thrace
