Comparison of two different measurement methods to determine glenoid bone defects: area or width?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid15051601900
dc.authorscopusid8143714600
dc.authorscopusid8450175300
dc.authorscopusid8526841200
dc.authorwosidOzbaydar, Mehmet/AAS-2718-2020
dc.authorwosidYalcin, Levent/AAR-9528-2021
dc.authorwosidOzbaydar, Mehmet/D-7391-2016
dc.contributor.authorAltan, Egemen
dc.contributor.authorÖzbaydar, Mehmet Uğur
dc.contributor.authorTonbul, Murat
dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Levent
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:36:08Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:36:08Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dal
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study compared two different techniques that have been used to measure the glenoids of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: We analyzed 36 patients who had received arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. Retrospectively, 3-dimensional computed tomography images of both shoulders were available for these patients. Two measurement methods were compared to determine the glenoid defects. One of these techniques is based on linear measurement, previously defined as the glenoid index. The other method is based on surface area measurement. Subsequently, 3 more diameters and the average values obtained from these diameters were compared with the surface measurement method. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was assessed to determine the relationship. Results: There was an almost perfect relationship between measurement methods when the defect area was less than 6% of the inferior glenoid circle (r, 0.915; P < .001). This relation decreased and the difference became more pronounced (r, 0.343; P=.657) when the bone loss exceeded 14% of the inferior glenoid circle. The highest correlations with the actual defects were the average values obtained from 4 different diameters (r, 0.964; P < .001) and the 4-o'clock position of the single diameter measurements (r, 0.860; P=.001). In addition, 11 patients had crescent-like defects, demonstrating a relatively low correlation between the measurement methods (r, 0.679; P=.021). Conclusion: Although the best correlation was achieved from average values obtained from different diameter positions, in practical use, we advise a linear measurement to estimate the glenoid bone loss at the 4-o'clock position to achieve a high correlation between the measurement techniques. Level of evidence: Level III, Diagnostic Study. (C) 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.029
dc.identifier.endpage1222
dc.identifier.issn1058-2746
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24581417
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84904804320
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1215
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8383
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341135000024
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÖzbaydar, Mehmet Uğur
dc.institutionauthorTonbul, Murat
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectGlenoid bone loss
dc.subjectinstability
dc.subjectglenoid index
dc.subjectarthroscopy
dc.subjectshoulder
dc.subjectPico method
dc.subjectRecurrent Anterior Dislocation
dc.subjectShoulder Instability
dc.subjectGlenohumeral Joint
dc.subjectBare Spot
dc.subjectCt
dc.subjectArthroscopy
dc.subjectCavity
dc.titleComparison of two different measurement methods to determine glenoid bone defects: area or width?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
8383.pdf
Boyut:
718.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu