Köy-Koop hareketinin Türk kooperatifçiliğinin gelişimine olan etkileri
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2008
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Namık Kemal Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Köy Kalkınma Kooperatifleri özellikle 1960’lı yıllarda Türk kooperatifçilik hareketinin öncüsü konumunda olup demokratik kooperatifçilik açısından olumlu katkılar saglamıslardır. Türk kooperatifçiligi o döneme kadar gerçek anlamda tabandan gelen bir kooperatifçilik hareketi ile tanısmamıstır. Ancak ülkemiz ekonomisinde, özellikle de tarımın gelismesi açısından kooperatifçiligin önemi bu kooperatiflerle ortaya çıkmıstır. Fakat bu hareket özellikle 1980’li yıllara gelindiginde o dönemde uygulanan politikalar aracılıgı ile hızını kaybetmis ve son yıllara kadar gerçek anlamda yerini bulamamıstır. Kooperatifçiligin gelismesinin çok yönlü iliskilerle düsünülmesi, bunun için de gerekli tedbirlerin bir an önce alınması gerekmektedir. Ülkemiz ekonomisinde tarımda çalısan nüfus hala %29,4 iken, bu kooperatifler 6850 kooperatif, 748.000 ortak, 78 birlik sayısı ile ülkemiz tarımındaki önemini korumaktadır. Günümüzde kooperatiflerin sorunları ortaya konulup çözüm önerileri defalarca tekrar edilmektedir. Ancak sorunları çözmek yerine yeni sorunlar eklenmektedir. Kooperatiflere alternatif olarak üretici birlikleri, köylere hizmet götürme birlikleri gibi yeni örgütler önerilmektedir. Köylü kendi örgütünü kurup, yönetebilecegini zaten ispatlamıstır. Tarımın sorunları bir bütün olarak düsünülüp, bir an önce bagımsız demokratik kooperatiflerinin sorunlarının ciddiyetle ve titizlikle çözülmesi gerekmektedir. Bugün örnek aldıgımız AB tarımını kooperatiflerle kalkındırmıstır. Küçük üreticiler bu kooperatifler sayesinde ayakta kalmıstır. ste bu nedenlerle bu çalısmada, Türk kooperatifçilik hareketi açısından önemi yadsınamayacak, Köy Kalkınma Kooperatifleri daha derinlemesine incelenmis ve bu hareket içerisinde yer alan kisilerle görüsülerek analiz edilmis, ülkemiz kooperatifçiliginin gelismesi açısından gerekli ipuçları ortaya çıkarılmıstır. Özellikle 1980 öncesi ve sonrası yöneticilik yapmıs kooperatifçilerin devletle iliskiler ve finansman açısından görüsleri oldukça dikkat çekicidir. Bu kooperatiflerin Devletle iliskileri tekrar gözden geçirilmelidir. Arastırma sonucunda kooperatif isletmelerin profesyonel yöneticilerle yönetilmesi gerçegi, politika olusturmada daha etkin katılım, asıl çalısma konularında yatırım yapması ve ekonomik çıkarlar gözetilerek daha etkin isbirligi geregi ortaya çıkmıstır.
Especially in 1960s Köy-Koops were in the situation of being a pioneer of the Turkish cooperative movement and in terms of democratic cooperative system made positive contributions. Until that period of time, Turkish cooperative system had not really been introduced with a cooperative movement based on members. However, in Turkish economy, especially in terms of developing the agriculture, the importance of the cooperative system was realized with these cooperatives. Unfortunately cooperative movement, especially in 1980’s lost its development due to the policies applied and until the recent years, they really could not find their places. It is necessary to think the development of cooperative system with versatile relations, so the necessary precautions should be taken as soon as possible. In our country's economy, people that have been working in agriculture still has a share of %29,4 ,these cooperatives 6850 in number 748.000 members with the number of 78 regional cooperative unions, have still been keeping their importance in agriculture. At present, the problems of the cooperatives have been set forth, but the solutions to the problems are suggested again and again. Instead of solving the problems, new problems are added ( like developing new organization models ).There is no need for new models. Villagers have already proved that they can establish and govern their own organizations. The problems of agriculture should be thought as a whole, because it is necessary to solve the problems of independent and democratic cooperatives as soon as possible and meticulously. EU, which we have taken as a model today, developed its agriculture by the help of cooperatives. The small producers have survived thanks to these cooperatives. For these reasons, in this study, in terms of Turkish cooperative system movement, the importance cannot be inconvertible, the Village Development Cooperatives have been studied in depth and by making interviews with the people of this movement has been analyzed, in terms of developing our country's cooperative system the necessary clues have been come into open. Especially the members of cooperatives who were in cooperative management before and after 1980, the opinions of those in terms of the relationship with the government and finance are remarkable. The relations of these cooperatives with the government should be revised again. As a result of the research, it has been clear that cooperatives should be managed by professional managers, efficient participation for creating cooperative policy investing funds in basic cooperative activities and more efficient cooperation considering the economic profits were seen necessary.
Especially in 1960s Köy-Koops were in the situation of being a pioneer of the Turkish cooperative movement and in terms of democratic cooperative system made positive contributions. Until that period of time, Turkish cooperative system had not really been introduced with a cooperative movement based on members. However, in Turkish economy, especially in terms of developing the agriculture, the importance of the cooperative system was realized with these cooperatives. Unfortunately cooperative movement, especially in 1980’s lost its development due to the policies applied and until the recent years, they really could not find their places. It is necessary to think the development of cooperative system with versatile relations, so the necessary precautions should be taken as soon as possible. In our country's economy, people that have been working in agriculture still has a share of %29,4 ,these cooperatives 6850 in number 748.000 members with the number of 78 regional cooperative unions, have still been keeping their importance in agriculture. At present, the problems of the cooperatives have been set forth, but the solutions to the problems are suggested again and again. Instead of solving the problems, new problems are added ( like developing new organization models ).There is no need for new models. Villagers have already proved that they can establish and govern their own organizations. The problems of agriculture should be thought as a whole, because it is necessary to solve the problems of independent and democratic cooperatives as soon as possible and meticulously. EU, which we have taken as a model today, developed its agriculture by the help of cooperatives. The small producers have survived thanks to these cooperatives. For these reasons, in this study, in terms of Turkish cooperative system movement, the importance cannot be inconvertible, the Village Development Cooperatives have been studied in depth and by making interviews with the people of this movement has been analyzed, in terms of developing our country's cooperative system the necessary clues have been come into open. Especially the members of cooperatives who were in cooperative management before and after 1980, the opinions of those in terms of the relationship with the government and finance are remarkable. The relations of these cooperatives with the government should be revised again. As a result of the research, it has been clear that cooperatives should be managed by professional managers, efficient participation for creating cooperative policy investing funds in basic cooperative activities and more efficient cooperation considering the economic profits were seen necessary.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kooperatifçilik, Tarım, Köy Kalkınma Kooperatifleri, Tarımsal Kalkınma Kooperatifleri, Devletle iliskiler, The Cooperative System, Agriculture, The Village Development Cooperatives, Agricultural Development Cooperatives, Relations With The Government
