Bodur Kiraz Bahçelerinde Dam la ve Mikro Yağmurlama Sulama Yöntemlerinin Yatırım ve İşletme Masraflan Yonunden Karşılaştırılması
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2007
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Ankara Univ, Fac Agr
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Öz: Bu çalışmada, Tekirdağ Bağcılık Araştırma Enstitüsü arazisinde seçilen 27.3 da büyüklüğündeki bir kiraz bahçesinde, damla ve mikro yağmurlama sulama yöntemlerinin sulama suyu ihtiyacı, ilk tesis masrafı, yıllık işletme masrafı, enerji masrafı ve toplam masraflar açısından karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, alanı toprak özellikleri saptanmış, kirazın su tüketimi ve sulama suyu ihtiyacı hesaplanmış, sulama sistemleri planlanmış, sistem debileri belirlenmiş, sistem unsurları boyutlandırılmış ve 2006 yılı fiyatlarına göre proje keşif özetleri hazırlanmıştır. Ekonomik analiz yapılarak, her sistem için, tesis masrafı, yatırım masrafı, yıllık sabit masraf, enerji masrafı, bakım-onarım masrafı, sulama işçiliği masrafı ve yıllık toplam masraf değerleri belirlenmiştir. Sonuçta, mevsimlik toplam sulama suyu ihtiyacı, damla sulama yönteminde 397 mm, mikro yağmurlama sulama yönteminde ise 482 mm bulunmuştur. Sistem debisi damla sulama yönteminde 3.56 L/s, mikro yağmurlama sulama yönteminde ise 5.12 L/s olmuştur. Yıllık toplam yatırım masrafı ve yıllık toplam masraflar, damla sulama yönteminde mikro yağmurlama sulama yöntemine göre sırasıyla % 17 ve % 13 daha fazla bulunmuştur. Bu değerlere göre, kiraz sulamasında düşük dinamik yüksekliğe sahip kuyulardan yararlanılması durumunda, su kaynağı yeterli ise mikro yağmurlama sulama, aksi takdirde, damla sulama yönteminin seçilmesi önerilmiştir.
This study was conducted in the field of Tekirdag Viticulture Research Institute. Drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods were compared in respect to irrigation water requirements, establishment cost, running cost, energy cost and annual total cost in the cherry orchard of 27.3 da. For this purpose, soil characteristics were determined, irrigation water requirements of cherry was calculated, and then, irrigation systems were planned, system capacities were determined, system components were designed and project estimated costs were prepared according to prices of year of 2006. The cost of establishment, capital, fixed, energy, maintenance, labour of irrigation and annual total costs were calculated by economic analysis. As a result, seasonal irrigation water requirements were found 397 mm and 482 mm for drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods, respectively. System capacities were determined as 3.56 L/s in drip irrigation method and 5.12 L/s in micro sprinkler irrigation method. Annual total capital cost and annual total cost were found as upper at the level of 17% and 13%, respectively, in drip irrigation method than micro sprinkler irrigation method. According to the this results, it has been suggested that, when irrigation water has been taken from the wells with low dynamic head, if water source has been adequate micro sprinkler irrigation method can be applied, but if water is scarce drip irrigation method should be preferred.
This study was conducted in the field of Tekirdag Viticulture Research Institute. Drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods were compared in respect to irrigation water requirements, establishment cost, running cost, energy cost and annual total cost in the cherry orchard of 27.3 da. For this purpose, soil characteristics were determined, irrigation water requirements of cherry was calculated, and then, irrigation systems were planned, system capacities were determined, system components were designed and project estimated costs were prepared according to prices of year of 2006. The cost of establishment, capital, fixed, energy, maintenance, labour of irrigation and annual total costs were calculated by economic analysis. As a result, seasonal irrigation water requirements were found 397 mm and 482 mm for drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods, respectively. System capacities were determined as 3.56 L/s in drip irrigation method and 5.12 L/s in micro sprinkler irrigation method. Annual total capital cost and annual total cost were found as upper at the level of 17% and 13%, respectively, in drip irrigation method than micro sprinkler irrigation method. According to the this results, it has been suggested that, when irrigation water has been taken from the wells with low dynamic head, if water source has been adequate micro sprinkler irrigation method can be applied, but if water is scarce drip irrigation method should be preferred.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Cherry, drip irrigation method, micro sprinkler irrigation method, irrigation water requirement, irrigation costs, Economics
Kaynak
Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
13
Sayı
1
