Impairment of Voice Quality in Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion Dysfunction

dc.authorscopusid23969706000
dc.authorscopusid26648338400
dc.authorscopusid20134405600
dc.authorscopusid12242974200
dc.authorscopusid12242496000
dc.contributor.authorYelken, Kürşat
dc.contributor.authorGültekin, Erdoğan
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEyibilen, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorAladağ, İbrahim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:36:03Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:36:03Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun ve Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjectives/Hypothesis. To compare subjective and objective voice-quality parameters between asymptomatic paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction (PVFMD) patients and healthy individuals. Study Design. Prospective. Methods. A total number of 12 patients with PVFMD and 12 healthy control subjects had voice evaluations by means of laryngostroboscopy, acoustic analysis (jitter, shimmer, and harmonics-to-noise ratio [HNR]), aerodynamic measurements (maximum phonation time [MPT], s/z ratio), and perceptual analysis (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenicity, and Strain Scale [GRBAS] and Voice Handicap Index-10 [VHI-10] scales). Evaluations were conducted when all the patients were asymptomatic. Results. False vocal cord adduction, anteroposterior constriction of the supraglottic larynx, decreased amplitude, and decreased mucosa] wave were observed in the great majority of the PVFMD patients during laryngostroboscopy. Mean jitter and shimmer rates were significantly high in PVFMD patients and there was no significant difference in mean HNR between groups (P < 0.05). Mean MPT was significantly long in control subjects (P < 0.05) and mean s/z ratio was nearly equal between patients and control subjects. There was a statistically significant difference between groups about GRBAS and VHI-10 scales (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Based on the subjective and objective voice parameters, voice quality is significantly impaired in asymptomatic PVFMD patients when compared with the healthy control subjects.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.004
dc.identifier.endpage727
dc.identifier.issn0892-1997
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20097526
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78650219219
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage724
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8350
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000285495600014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGültekin, Erdoğan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Voice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectParadoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction
dc.subjectLaryngostroboscopy
dc.subjectAcoustic analysis
dc.subjectAerodynamic measurements
dc.subjectGRBAS
dc.subjectVoice Handicap index-10
dc.subjectChronic Cough
dc.subjectMovement
dc.titleImpairment of Voice Quality in Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion Dysfunction
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
8350.pdf
Boyut:
157.31 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text