Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO2 Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems

dc.authorid0000-0003-4273-7417
dc.authorid0000-0001-6733-2067
dc.authorscopusid57195721415
dc.authorscopusid25627176000
dc.authorscopusid56307951100
dc.authorscopusid57224222526
dc.authorscopusid8575858300
dc.authorscopusid57273526000
dc.authorscopusid6603360127
dc.authorwosidAcarer, Seren/ABF-6927-2021
dc.authorwosidAcarer, Seren/AAA-6560-2022
dc.authorwosidDurak, Sevgi Güneş/J-3705-2019
dc.contributor.authorTürkoğlu Demirkol, Güler
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Suna Özden
dc.contributor.authorGüneş Durak, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorAcarer, Seren
dc.contributor.authorÇetin, Ender
dc.contributor.authorAkarçay Demir, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorTüfekçi, Neşe
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:17:31Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentFakülteler, Çorlu Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractMany treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged membrane systems were evaluated separately. When Fe(OH)(3) was applied in the aeration step and complete oxidation of Fe2+ was obtained after 27 min, while complete Mn2+ oxidation was obtained in 76 min. However, when MnO2 was applied in the aeration step, complete oxidation of Fe2+ and Mn2+ was relatively slow (36 and 110 min, respectively). According to the results obtained from the aerated membrane system, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal were extended by Fe(OH)(3) via adsorption/surface oxidation. It is clearly shown from the flux, resistance results, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy observation that manganese oxides were deposited mainly in membrane pores forming membrane fouling by small flocs, while iron oxide particles were deposited on the membrane surface. Although the flux performance of PT PES membrane was higher than HF PP membrane, fouling resistance of HF PP membrane was higher than PT PES.
dc.description.sponsorshipIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [55551]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, grant number 55551.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym13193201
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.issue19en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34641017
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85115774697
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193201
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/6384
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000707205200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÇelik, Suna Özden
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofPolymers
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectFe2+
dc.subjectMn2+
dc.subjectremoval
dc.subjectmembrane
dc.subjectfouling
dc.subjectDrinking-Water
dc.subjectSurface Characterization
dc.subjectPolymeric Membranes
dc.subjectManganese Removal
dc.subjectIron
dc.subjectOxidation
dc.subjectUf
dc.subjectMicrofiltration
dc.subjectMechanism
dc.subjectAmmonia
dc.titleEffects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO2 Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6384.pdf
Boyut:
8.47 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text