The Transition from Self-Regulation to Public Oversight in the Independent Audit: An Investigation of Developments by Accounting Sub-Culture
dc.authorscopusid | 57292124000 | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarısoy, Ö. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-11T14:47:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-11T14:47:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Meslek Yüksekokulları, Muratlı Meslek Yüksekokulu, Muhasebe ve Vergi Bölümü | |
dc.description.abstract | Although the independent audit environment has changed from time to time, it has increased its importance in the capitalist economic system day by day. The patronage of the audit activity, which occasionally had significant criticism, was carried out by professional organizations with a recent self-regulation approach. At the beginning of the current century, the scandals that took place led to partial abandoning of self-regulation and led to the establishment of autonomous public oversight institutions authorized to oversee independent auditing. Public oversight institutions, which have been implemented in many countries, have followed different trends among countries. In this research, the various characteristics of the public oversight institutions of some selected countries were examined. Moreover, the similarities and differences between the countries were discussed in terms of subcultural dimensions. As a result of the descriptive research carried out, it is observed that public oversight institutions have been implemented in Anglo-Saxon culture before other countries. More similar approaches were seen in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European countries. In European countries with Mediterranean culture and Asian countries, the more different positions are observed. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | The establishment of PCAOB was supported by professional organizations in the U.S., but KGK has faced many criticisms in Turkey. A considerable number of experts, consisting of academics and professionals, who continue their work in the accounting and auditing sector, supported the establishment of the KGK. However, the KGK was criticized clearly in its establishment (Tulun 2014: 91).These criticisms can be handled within different categories. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_3 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 86 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2509-7873 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85116933927 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 43 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10441 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.institutionauthor | Sarısoy, Ö. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance and Fraud | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Accounting sub-culture | |
dc.subject | Audit's self-regulation structure | |
dc.subject | Public oversight | |
dc.subject | Public oversight in Turkey | |
dc.title | The Transition from Self-Regulation to Public Oversight in the Independent Audit: An Investigation of Developments by Accounting Sub-Culture | |
dc.type | Book Chapter |