Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCimilli, Tan
dc.contributor.authorBayramoğlu, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Sema
dc.contributor.authorKılıçkesmez, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Arda
dc.contributor.authorAlibek, Sedat
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:40:59Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:40:59Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/9007
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the ability and accuracy of a respiratory gated technique used with contrast enhanced MDCT of the upper abdomen with focus on diagnostic image quality and depiction of organs and major vessels. Materials and methods: Forty-five adult patients who were referred to our institution for follow-up dynamic contrast enhanced abdominal CT imaging were included in this study. Respiratory gated CT scans were performed with the use of a dedicated hardware. A multiphasic CT scan was performed for each patient Respiratory gated images were obtained between early arterial and portal venous phases during free breathing. Images of respiratory gated (RG) and breathhold (BH) phases were compared qualitatively and quantitatively by two radiologists. Definitive statistical methods were used for evaluating the scoring data, while Mann Whitney U test was used for comparison. Statistical significance was accepted for p values <0.05. Results: Statistical significant difference was found for comparison of scores regarding luminal opacification and contoural integrity of intrahepatic vascular structures with scores of RG scans rated poor to moderate (e.g. 2.86 +/- 1.07 for luminal opacification of intrahepatic portal veins as well as border detectability) in comparison to scores of BH scans rated good to excellent (e.g. 1.37 +/- 1.31 for lumina] opacification, 1.35 +/- 1.28 for border detectability of intrahepatic portal veins, p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistical significant differences were found for general image noise levels (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Further technical advances of RG technique could enable routine use of this technique for selected patient groups. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.016
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdomenen_US
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory gatingen_US
dc.subjectCten_US
dc.subjectArtifactsen_US
dc.titleRespiratory gated multidetector computed tomography: Applicable for diagnostic abdominal imaging?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Radiologyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4658-2192
dc.authorid0000-0001-7500-7707
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage434en_US
dc.identifier.endpage438en_US
dc.institutionauthorKayhan, Arda
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid24723731500
dc.authorscopusid24470980000
dc.authorscopusid24074028400
dc.authorscopusid15219821600
dc.authorscopusid25027835200
dc.authorscopusid24281266500
dc.authorwosidCimilli, Ahmet Tan/AAC-6411-2022
dc.authorwosidAlibek, Sedat/AAT-2855-2021
dc.authorwosidKILICKESMEZ, Ozgur/AAX-7749-2021
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000275987600038en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-76349102090en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19121905en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster