Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBali, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorAziret, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSözen, Selim
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Seyfi
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorÇetinkunar, Süleyman
dc.contributor.authorIrkorucu, Oktay
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:34:55Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1807-5932
dc.identifier.issn1980-5322
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8143
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is common in young men and may recur over time after surgery. We investigated whether a factor exists that can aid in the determination of the preferred technique between the early Limberg flap and Karydakis flap techniques for treating recurrent pilonidal sinus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective and randomized study enrolled 71 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus in whom the Limberg flap or Karydakis flap techniques were applied for reconstruction after excision. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: 37 patients were treated with the Limberg flap technique and 34 patients were treated with the Karydakis flap technique. Fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, partial wound separation, return to daily activities, pain score, complete healing time, painless seating and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02287935. RESULTS: The development rates of total fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, and partial wound separation were 9.8%, 16%, 7%, 15% and 4.2%, respectively; total flap necrosis was not observed in any patient (p<0.001). During the average follow-up of 28 months, no patients (0%) developed recurrent disease. The two groups differed with respect to early surgical complications (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, use of the Limberg flap was associated with lower complication rates, shorter length of hospital stay, early return to work, low pain score, high patient satisfaction and better complete healing duration. Therefore, we recommend the Limberg flap for treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHospital Clinicas, Univ Sao Pauloen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKarydakis flapen_US
dc.subjectLimberg techniqueen_US
dc.subjectRecurrent pilonidal sinusen_US
dc.subjectRandomized-Trialen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Closureen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectOperationen_US
dc.subjectExcisionen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus diseaseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinicsen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-2006-9198
dc.authorid0000-0001-8707-5301
dc.authorid0000-0001-6758-7289
dc.authorid0000-0001-9111-2734
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage350en_US
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.institutionauthorBali, İlhan
dc.institutionauthorSözen, Selim
dc.institutionauthorEmir, Seyfi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55624501100
dc.authorscopusid35791793300
dc.authorscopusid35410250800
dc.authorscopusid17433815200
dc.authorscopusid36134374200
dc.authorscopusid24398544300
dc.authorscopusid8431600000
dc.authorwosidCetinkunar, Suleyman/AFP-2813-2022
dc.authorwosidSözen, Selim/ABA-6337-2020
dc.authorwosidAZİRET, MEHMET/I-5483-2014
dc.authorwosidirkorucu, oktay/AAL-7383-2020
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000355800500008en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930511910en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26039952en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster