Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇiftçi, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorKurc, Mine Aydin
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ayşe Demet
dc.contributor.authorSaraçoğlu Varol, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorGültekin, Erdoğan
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:12:39Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:12:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0196-0709
dc.identifier.issn1532-818X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.02.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/5627
dc.description24th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) -- MAY 10-13, 2014 -- Barcelona, SPAINen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The novel silicone intranasal splints are suggested to resist biofilm formation due to their surface characteristics. We aimed to ascertain the necessity of coating these splints with antibiotics to prevent splint associated infections, in vitro. Materials and methods: Pieces of Doyle II airway nasal splints made of medical grade silicone were divided into two test groups, treated with either (i) 0.2% nitrofurazone solution or (ii) 0.2% nitrofurazone containing ointment, and a control group, treated with (iii) 0.9% saline. Splint pieces were then incubated with Staphylococcus aureus solutions at 37 degrees C for 48 and 96 h. Following this, the splint pieces were incubated in 20 ml Mueller Hinton agar and appearing colonies were counted. Results: Following 48 and 96 h of incubation, the colonization rates in the saline group were significantly higher than the nitrofurazone ointment group (p < 0.001). The colonization rates in the liquid nitrofurazone group were significantly lower in comparison to the nitrofurazone ointment group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019 respectively). Conclusions: The method of coating the splints with antibiotic was superior to using uncoated splints in terms of preventing S. aureus colonization. The rather smooth surfaces of the splints were insufficient to block bacterial colonization and coating them with antibiotics seems to be beneficial for the prevention of infections. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.02.007
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectToxic-Shock-Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectNasal Splintsen_US
dc.subjectBacterial-Colonizationen_US
dc.subjectSeptal Splintsen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectDecolonizationen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectMorbidityen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.titleDo we really need to coat the novel silicone intranasal splints with antibiotics?en_US
dc.typeproceedingPaperen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Otolaryngologyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun ve Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Halk Sağlığı Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5053-4276
dc.authorid0000-0003-3307-085X
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage447en_US
dc.identifier.endpage451en_US
dc.institutionauthorÇiftçi, Zafer
dc.institutionauthorKurc, Mine Aydin
dc.institutionauthorSaraçoğlu Varol, Gamze
dc.institutionauthorDeniz, Mahmut
dc.institutionauthorGültekin, Erdoğan
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55078843000
dc.authorscopusid57188862011
dc.authorscopusid57188868231
dc.authorscopusid27968034900
dc.authorscopusid15055538600
dc.authorscopusid26648338400
dc.authorwosidKURÇ, Mine AYDIN/ABA-8088-2020
dc.authorwosidCiftci, Zafer/AAW-9972-2021
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000384277600009en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963954623en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27105976en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster