Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGünaydın, Burak
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, A.
dc.contributor.authorSarı, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Çağatay
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, B.E.
dc.contributor.authorKuşak, I.
dc.contributor.authorKabukçuoğlu, Yavuz Selim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:04:56Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:04:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1743-9191
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/4841
dc.description.abstractBackground: Studies have shown that the anterolateral ligament contributes to knee stability. This study aims to compare the results of postoperative physical examinations, knee joint stability tests, and functional assessment tests of patients with intact anterolateral (AL) ligaments and patients with ruptured anterolateral (AL) ligaments. Material and method: This study consisted of 101 patients, with at least a 12-month follow-up period, who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2010 and 2016, and whose AL ligaments were evaluated by the radiologist with the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI). Of these patients, 41 had intact AL ligament (Group 1) in MRI and other 60 had ruptured AL ligament (Group 2). Groups were compared according to postoperative physical examinations, knee joint stability tests, and functional assessment tests. Results: The average Lysholm score of Group 1 was 94.9 (range: 81–100), and the score of Group 2 was 87.2 (range: 74–100). The modified Cincinnati score of Group 1 was 28.7 (24–30), while the score of Group 2 was 25.6 (21–30). The average IKDC subjective knee evaluation score of Group 1 was 91.9 (range: 83–100), and the score of Group 2 was 86.6 (range: 75–100). The average thigh atrophy value was 1.5 centimeters (cm) in Group 1 and 2.4 cm in Group 2. Thirty-three patients in Group 1 were able to jump over 85% of the distance in single-legged hop test compared to the intact side, while 16 patients in Group 2 were able to jump over this distance successfully. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the Lysholm activity scoring results, the Modified Cincinnati scoring results, IKDC subjective knee evaluation results, two-cycle IKDC activity scale results, comparison of thigh diameters and one leg hop tests of two groups showed a statistically significant difference, and the results of the patients with intact AL ligaments who underwent an ACL reconstruction were found to be better (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in other examinations and tests. Conclusion: Since the rupture of the AL ligament has negative effects on functional outcomes, we think that the reconstruction of the AL ligament in the same session with the ACL reconstruction or later will have a positive effect on functional outcomes. © 2019 IJS Publishing Group Ltden_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.010
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjectAnterolateral ligamenten_US
dc.subjectArthroscopic reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectFunctional scoring of the kneeen_US
dc.subjectMRIen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament ruptureen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectatrophyen_US
dc.subjectclinical articleen_US
dc.subjectclinical outcomeen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjectfunctional assessmenten_US
dc.subjecthamstring tendonen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectkneeen_US
dc.subjectknee instabilityen_US
dc.subjectlegen_US
dc.subjectLysholm scoreen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmedical societyen_US
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal systemen_US
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal system parametersen_US
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectorthopedic specialisten_US
dc.subjectphysical examinationen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative careen_US
dc.subjectpreoperative careen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectrange of motionen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectsports medicineen_US
dc.subjectthighen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectinjuriesen_US
dc.subjectjoint ligamenten_US
dc.subjectpathophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectruptureen_US
dc.subjectyoung adulten_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectKnee Jointen_US
dc.subjectLigaments, Articularen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectRuptureen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleDoes anterolateral ligament rupture affect functional outcomes in patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume65en_US
dc.identifier.startpage25en_US
dc.identifier.endpage31en_US
dc.institutionauthorGünaydın, Burak
dc.institutionauthorSarı, Abdulkadir
dc.institutionauthorTekin, Çağatay
dc.institutionauthorKabukçuoğlu, Yavuz Selim
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid56421955000
dc.authorscopusid7003278840
dc.authorscopusid57196712908
dc.authorscopusid57207910280
dc.authorscopusid56576183700
dc.authorscopusid57207912477
dc.authorscopusid57207908663
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000466781700005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063198817en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30885836en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster