Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEser, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorÖzkalaycı, Nurhat
dc.contributor.authorYetmez, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorErener, Hande
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-06T17:20:47Z
dc.date.available2023-05-06T17:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020724
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/11938
dc.description.abstractBracket failure is one of the most important problems encountered during fixed orthodontic treatment. For this reason, different types of adhesive agents have been developed over the years. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to teeth etched with a conventional acid etching method in a laboratory environment by using different types of adhesive agents and comparing the number of shear strokes. Sixty human maxillary premolars were divided into three groups and Gemini stainless steel metal brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded to all teeth. In Group 1, Transbond (TM) XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and Transbond (TM) XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste composite (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were used. In Group 2, BracePaste((R)) MTP Primer (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, CA, USA) and BracePaste((R)) Adhesive composite (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were used. In Group 3, Ortho Solo (TM) Primer (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) and Grengloo (TM) Adhesive composite (Ormco, Brea, CA, USA) were used. The samples were subjected to a shear test with a closed-loop controlled, low-cycle fatigue machine with a capacity of 10 N and a crosshead speed of 300 mm/min. The number of shear strokes of the brackets was recorded. According to the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests performed on the data obtained, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the numbers of shear strokes (p < 0.05). Significantly higher numbers of shear strokes and higher shear bond strengths were observed in Group 3 compared with Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the numbers of shear strokes for Group 1 and Group 2 samples (p > 0.05). To conclude the study, it was observed that the type of adhesive used had an effect on the bond strength of the bracket and that the Grengloo (TM) adhesive agent showed higher shear bond strength. It was observed that BracePaste((R)) Adhesive and Transbond (TM) XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste adhesive agents had similar shear bond strengths.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma16020724
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectorthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectbracketsen_US
dc.subjectadhesive agenten_US
dc.subjectbondingen_US
dc.subjectcyclic loadingen_US
dc.subjectshear strokeen_US
dc.subjectstrengthen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaterialsen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.authoridYetmez, Mehmet/0000-0001-9120-1673
dc.authoridÇiçek, Orhan/0000-0002-8172-6043
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.institutionauthorErener, Hande
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidYetmez, Mehmet/Q-9465-2019
dc.authorwosidÇiçek, Orhan/B-1629-2019
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000927783900001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146486660en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36676460en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster