Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSarısoy, Ö.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:47:08Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2509-7873
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10441
dc.description.abstractAlthough the independent audit environment has changed from time to time, it has increased its importance in the capitalist economic system day by day. The patronage of the audit activity, which occasionally had significant criticism, was carried out by professional organizations with a recent self-regulation approach. At the beginning of the current century, the scandals that took place led to partial abandoning of self-regulation and led to the establishment of autonomous public oversight institutions authorized to oversee independent auditing. Public oversight institutions, which have been implemented in many countries, have followed different trends among countries. In this research, the various characteristics of the public oversight institutions of some selected countries were examined. Moreover, the similarities and differences between the countries were discussed in terms of subcultural dimensions. As a result of the descriptive research carried out, it is observed that public oversight institutions have been implemented in Anglo-Saxon culture before other countries. More similar approaches were seen in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European countries. In European countries with Mediterranean culture and Asian countries, the more different positions are observed. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe establishment of PCAOB was supported by professional organizations in the U.S., but KGK has faced many criticisms in Turkey. A considerable number of experts, consisting of academics and professionals, who continue their work in the accounting and auditing sector, supported the establishment of the KGK. However, the KGK was criticized clearly in its establishment (Tulun 2014: 91).These criticisms can be handled within different categories.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_3
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccounting sub-cultureen_US
dc.subjectAudit's self-regulation structureen_US
dc.subjectPublic oversighten_US
dc.subjectPublic oversight in Turkeyen_US
dc.titleThe Transition from Self-Regulation to Public Oversight in the Independent Audit: An Investigation of Developments by Accounting Sub-Cultureen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.relation.ispartofAccounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance and Frauden_US
dc.departmentMeslek Yüksekokulları, Muratlı Meslek Yüksekokulu, Muhasebe ve Vergi Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.startpage43en_US
dc.identifier.endpage86en_US
dc.institutionauthorSarısoy, Ö.
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57292124000
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85116933927en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster