Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEseceli, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorAyasan, Tugay
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Fisun
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Vasfiye Kader
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:46:42Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2564-7814
dc.identifier.issn2587-2249
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/V35I2/AJAS20080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10349
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to exhibit the importance of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and mock privet (Phillyrea latifolia L.) in the grazing system and animal feeding. For this purpose, the leaves of these two evergreen shrubs were harvested by hand-clipping in their early vegetative stages at Sarkoy, Tekirdag, Turkey, in April 2019. The nutrient and mineral contents and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak and mock privet was determined by using in vitro gas production technique. In this study, it was found that there was a statistically significant difference between the kermes oak and mock privet in terms of the contents of dry matter, crude ash, crude cellulose, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin, and the minerals of zinc, copper, iron, and potassium (p<0.05). Furthermore, it has been observed that these two shrub plants yielded different values in terms of metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility (p<0.05). In this study, the time-dependent mean gas production of the two evergreen shrubs was found to be significant at all times except the 96th hour; and gas production kinetics made a significant difference in b, the volume of the gas production from slowly fermentable (p<0.05). The volume of the gas production from slowly fermentable (b) was found to be higher in the mock privet than the kermes oak. Results derived from this study indicate that even the differences between the kermes oak and mock privet in terms of nutrient and mineral contents, both shrubs might be used more adequately as an alternative feed source during the grazing season where they are widely distributed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAdem Yavuz Sonmezen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.47059/alinteri/V35I2/AJAS20080
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKermes oaken_US
dc.subjectMock priveten_US
dc.subjectNutrient contenten_US
dc.subjectMineral contenten_US
dc.subjectIn vitro gas productionen_US
dc.subjectNutritional Qualityen_US
dc.subjectYielden_US
dc.titleNutrient and Mineral Contents, and in vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and Mock Privet (Phillyrea latifolia L.)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAlinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4953-7960
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage100en_US
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.institutionauthorKoç, Fisun
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidESEN, Selim/ABA-3757-2020
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000625102800013en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster