Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTürker, Polat
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:36:58Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2147-2270
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/UOB.05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8507
dc.description.abstractBladder cancer is clinically understaged in about half of the cases and no improvements in solving this problem has been observed during the past 25 years. Patients who are clinically upstaged after radical cystectomy have higher recurrence and bladder cancer mortality rates when compared to those who are correctly staged. Currently, reliable predictors of extravesical upstaging at the time of radical cystectomy do not exist. In various studies of T2 staging, hydronephrosis, carcinoma in situ, high- grade disease, lymphovascular invasion, female gender and neutrophil- lymphocyte ratio are found to be associated with upstaging.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/UOB.05
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrethelial bladder canceren_US
dc.subjectupstagingen_US
dc.subjectclinical stagingen_US
dc.subjectpathological stagingen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy, the Factors Associated with Upstaging and its Effect on Outcomeen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncologyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage84en_US
dc.identifier.endpage87en_US
dc.institutionauthorTürker, Polat
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000219410600005en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster