Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBali, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorKarateke, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorÖzyazıcı, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorKuvvetli, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorOruc, Cem
dc.contributor.authorMenekse, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorÖzdoğan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Seyfi
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:34:55Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.56798
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8139
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Several appendiceal stump closure tecniques such as intracorporoeal-knotting, endoloop, stapler and clips are used during laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to compare intracorporoeal-knotting and endoloop tecniques used to close appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis in General Surgery Department of Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital between June 2009 and July 2013. The demographics, appendiceal stump closure tecniques, operation time, complications, and length of hospital stays of the patients were compared. RESULTS: A total of one hundred and twenty-six patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (Female: 81, Male: 45). Intracorporeal-knotting (Group 1) was performed in sixty-five patients; whereas, endoloop (Group 2) was performed in sixty-one patients in order to close appendiceal stump. The operation time was longer in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (62.0 +/- 10.67 min., 56.80 +/- 11.94 min., p=0.01). The length of hospital stays were nonsignificant between the groups. Four patients were complicated by superficial surgical site infection in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the operation time was found to be longer for intracorporeal knotting tecnique compared to endoloop tecnique; however, there was no significant difference regarding the length of hospital stay and complications. Performing intracorporeal-knotting technique is suggested since it is cheaper than endoloops and it may also improve hand manipulations of the surgeons who intend to advanced laparoscopy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/tjtes.2015.56798
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcute appendicitisen_US
dc.subjectappendiceal stumpen_US
dc.subjectendoloopen_US
dc.subjectintracorporeal knottingen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic appendectomyen_US
dc.subjectAppendiceal Stumpen_US
dc.titleComparison of intracorporeal knotting and endoloop for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomyen_US
dc.title.alternativeLaparoskopik appendektomide intrakorporal düğüm ve endoloop ile güdük kapama yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması]en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage446en_US
dc.identifier.endpage449en_US
dc.institutionauthorBali, İlhan
dc.institutionauthorEmir, Seyfi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55624501100
dc.authorscopusid45661308900
dc.authorscopusid55210124600
dc.authorscopusid24822724700
dc.authorscopusid54584164400
dc.authorscopusid25723566500
dc.authorscopusid17433815200
dc.authorwosidİriz, Erkan/AAF-2026-2019
dc.authorwosidKARATEKE, FARUK/AAB-5465-2020
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000368269100005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84945589322en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27054634en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster