Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞahin Kaya, Aysel
dc.contributor.authorPekcan, Gülden
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:07:27Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:07:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v22i3.9339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/5112
dc.description.abstractBackground & Aims: To determine the nutritional status of gastrointestinal cancer patients with two different nutritional screening tools and compare the tools. Methods: This study was held in 110 patients (female; 41.8% male: 58.2%), aged 19-65 years, admitted to hospital, diagnosed with gastrointestinal system cancer (not operated). The objective was to determine the nutritional status of the patients with nutrition screening tools (Subjective Global Assessment-SGA, Nutritional Risk Screening-NRS 2002), compare the tools, and describe the malnutrition status of patients. Socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters and 24- hour dietary recalls, frequency of foods consumed were determined. Results: Out of total, 54.7% of males and 56.5% of females had normal Body Mass Index-BMI. Using SGA, 49.1% of the patients had serious, 41.8% had moderate degree of malnutrition. According to NRS-2002, percent-ages of severely, moderately and mildly undernourished patients were 54.6%, 33.6% and 11.8%, respectively. The percentage of patients meeting the recommended Daily allowances was 47.2% and 58.1%, respectively for males and females. According to NRS and SGA tools, statistically significant differences with current weight, ideal body weight, usual body weight, percentage of weight loss, body mass index (BMI), mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST), mid-upper arm muscle area, mid-upper arm muscle circumference and mid-upper arm fat area (p<0.05) were found. Nutritional status of patients with SGA and NRS tests showed consistent similarity (kappa=0.671, p<0.001). Similar changes were found between SGA and NRS scores. Consistency was found statistically significant (r=0.786 and p=<0.001). Conclusion: One of the malnutrition screening tools could be preoperatively applied in gastrointestinal system cancer patients. Nutritional support should be planned and administered, when needed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMattioli 1885en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v22i3.9339
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal system cancersen_US
dc.subjectNRS-2002en_US
dc.subjectnutritional statusen_US
dc.subjectscreening toolsen_US
dc.subjectSGAen_US
dc.subjectSubjective Global Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectArtificial Nutritionen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectEnteral Nutritionen_US
dc.subjectChinese Patientsen_US
dc.subjectMalnutritionen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectPathogenesisen_US
dc.subjectGuidelinesen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of preoperative nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer using different nutritional screening testsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProgress In Nutritionen_US
dc.departmentYüksekokullar, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2037-3037
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.institutionauthorŞahin Kaya, Aysel
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidPekcan, A Gulden/AAI-6040-2021
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000607282500034en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster