Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aysel Şahin
dc.contributor.authorPekcan, G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:48:47Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v22i4.9339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/10684
dc.description.abstractBackground & Aims: To determine the nutritional status of gastrointestinal cancer patients with two different nutritional screening tools and compare the tools. Methods: This study was held in 110 patients (female; 41.8% male: 58.2%), aged 19-65 years, admitted to hospital, diagnosed with gastrointestinal system cancer (not operated). The objective was to determine the nutritional status of the patients with nutrition screening tools (Subjective Global Assessment-SGA, Nutritional Risk Screening-NRS 2002), compare the tools, and describe the malnutrition status of patients. Socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters and 24- hour dietary recalls, frequency of foods consumed were determined. Results: Out of total, 54.7% of males and 56.5% of females had normal Body Mass Index-BMI. Using SGA, 49.1% of the patients had serious, 41.8% had moderate degree of malnutrition. According to NRS-2002, percent-ages of severely, moderately and mildly undernourished patients were 54.6%, 33.6% and 11.8%, respectively. The percentage of patients meeting the recommended Daily allowances was 47.2% and 58.1%, respectively for males and females. According to NRS and SGA tools, statistically significant differences with current weight, ideal body weight, usual body weight, percentage of weight loss, body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST), mid-upper arm muscle area, mid-upper arm muscle circumference and mid-upper arm fat area (p<0.05) were found. Nutritional status of patients with SGA and NRS tests showed consistent similarity (?=0.671, p<0.001).Similar changes were found between SGA and NRS scores. Consistency was found statistically significant (r=0.786 and p=<0.001). Conclusion: One of the malnutrition screening tools could be preoperatively applied in gastrointestinal system cancer patients. Nutritional support should be planned and administered, when needed. © Mattioli 1885en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMattioli 1885en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v22i4.9339
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal system cancersen_US
dc.subjectNRS-2002en_US
dc.subjectNutritional statusen_US
dc.subjectScreening toolsen_US
dc.subjectSGAen_US
dc.subjectalpha tocopherolen_US
dc.subjectascorbic aciden_US
dc.subjectcalciumen_US
dc.subjectcarbohydrateen_US
dc.subjectcholesterolen_US
dc.subjectfaten_US
dc.subjectironen_US
dc.subjectmagnesiumen_US
dc.subjectphosphorusen_US
dc.subjectpotassiumen_US
dc.subjectproteinen_US
dc.subjectretinolen_US
dc.subjectriboflavinen_US
dc.subjectsodiumen_US
dc.subjectthiamineen_US
dc.subjectzincen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectanthropometric parametersen_US
dc.subjectarm circumferenceen_US
dc.subjectarm muscleen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectbiochemical analysisen_US
dc.subjectbody massen_US
dc.subjectbody weighten_US
dc.subjectbody weight lossen_US
dc.subjectcaloric intakeen_US
dc.subjectclinical assessment toolen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdietary intakeen_US
dc.subjectdigestive system canceren_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfood intakeen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectideal body weighten_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmalnutritionen_US
dc.subjectmeal skippingen_US
dc.subjectnutrient intakeen_US
dc.subjectnutritional assessmenten_US
dc.subjectNutritional Risk Screening NRS 2002en_US
dc.subjectnutritional statusen_US
dc.subjectscreening testen_US
dc.subjectskinfold thicknessen_US
dc.subjectSubjective Global Assessmenten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of preoperative nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer using different nutritional screening testsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Nutritionen_US
dc.departmentYüksekokullar, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.institutionauthorKaya, Aysel Şahin
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57222575367
dc.authorscopusid57225753404
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103242257en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster