Dogru, Yesim YavaslarKoc-Arik, GizemDogru, Onur CemBerument, Sibel Kazak2024-10-292024-10-2920240022-09651096-0457https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105924https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/14323The detrimental role of institutionalization in children's development has prompted the introduction of alternative care types designed to offer more personalized care. The current study aimed to test whether children in alternative care types (care villages, care homes, and foster care) performed better on vocabulary than those in institutions. The role of temperament, specifically perceptual sensitivity and frustration, and the interaction between temperament and care types on vocabulary performance were also explored. The study involved 285 2- to 5-year-old children from different care types, and they were assessed through receptive and expressive vocabulary tests and temperament scales. The results of the linear mixed model revealed that children in alternative care types exhibited significantly higher vocabulary scores compared with those in institutions. Moreover, perceptual sensitivity showed a positive association with receptive and expressive vocabulary skills and seemed to act as a protective factor by mitigating the lower vocabulary scores in institutions. Frustration moderated vocabulary outcomes differently for children in institutions and foster care, aligning with the diathesis-stress model and vantage sensitivity theory, respectively. The findings emphasize the positive role of alternative care types in vocabulary performance and the importance of children's temperamental traits in this process. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105924info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessInstitutionFoster careVocabularyTemperamentDiathesis-stressVantage sensitivityArticle243N/AWOS:0012868593000012-s2.0-8519088613238642417Q1