Günaydın, BurakŞahin, Gülcan GüçerSarı, AbdulkadirKara, A.Dinçel, Yaşar MahsutÇetin, Mehmet ÜmitKabukçuoğlu, Yavuz SelimTekin, Çağatay2022-05-112022-05-1120201743-9191https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/4511The authors regret that the figure captions in this article appeared incorrectly and should have been displayed as follows: Fig. 3. First patient's suspected partial tear in the sagittal section in the supine position with the knee in extension (knee MRI image) Fig. 4. The first patient's total tear image in a sagittal section in the prone position with the knee in maximum flexion (knee MRI image) Fig. 5. The second patient's suspected partial tear in a sagittal section in the supine position with the knee in extension (knee MRI image) Fig. 6. The second patient's total tear image in a sagittal section in the prone position with the knee in maximum flexion (knee MRI image) Fig. 7. The third patient's suspected partial tear in a sagittal section in the supine position with the knee in extension (knee MRI image) Fig. 8. The third patient's partial tear image in a sagittal section in the prone position with the knee in maximum flexion (knee MRI image)The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2019en10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesserratumCorrigendum to "A new method for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tear: MRI with maximum flexion of knee in the prone position: A case control study" (International Journal of Surgery (2019) 68 (142-147), (S1743919119301451), (10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.017))Erratum73123Q1WOS:0005068738000232-s2.0-8507715254431883749Q1