Yüksel, VolkanHüseyin, SerhatOkyay, AhmetGürkan, SelamiGür, ÖzcanCanbaz, SuatDuran, Enver2022-05-112022-05-1120121301-5680https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2012.095https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/8303Background: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of subxiphoid pericardiostomies in the treatment of patients with pericardial effusion (PE) and to discuss the etiology for this patient population. Methods: Between January 2004 and January 2011, 148 patients (77 males, 71 females; mean age 60.1 +/- 12.3 years; range 34 to 89 years;) who underwent a subxiphoid pericardiostomy and tube drainage due to a diagnosis of PE were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Echocardiography classified PE as severe in 36 patients, moderate in 68, and mild in 44. The main causes of PE were uremia and malignancy along with idiopathic and undefined tuberculous and non-tuberculous pericarditis. A perioperative myocardial injury requiring a sternotomy occurred in two patients. A histopathological examination contributed to the diagnosis in 84.3% of the patients with malignancy. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7% (n=11). Pericardial constriction requiring a pericardiectomy developed in two patients. Conclusion: Pericardial effusion can be an effective and quick method for managing adults with subxiphoid pericardiostomy.en10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2012.095info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessEtiologypericardial effusionpericardial tube drainagesubxiphoidal pericardiostomyPericardiocentesisArticle203492496Q4WOS:0003065305000112-s2.0-84866937398Q3