Microhardness evaluation of enamel adjacent to an improved GIC sealant after different enamel pre-treatment procedures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1555-3591
dc.authorid0000-0003-0792-2465
dc.authorid0000-0002-2778-6803
dc.authorwosidHaznedaroğlu, Eda/AAA-9039-2019
dc.authorwosidHaznedaroğlu, Eda/U-6139-2019
dc.authorwosidSozkes, Sarkis/ABA-6103-2020
dc.contributor.authorHaznedaroglu, E.
dc.contributor.authorSözkes, Sarkis
dc.contributor.authorMenteş, Süleyman Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:16:01Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:16:01Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentFakülteler, Çorlu Mühendislik Fakültesi, Biyomedikal Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractAim This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the microhardness of enamel adjacent to a glass ionomer cement (GIC) with high fluoride content used as a sealant (Fuji Triage, GC Corp., Japan) after laser, bur or air abrasion treatment procedures. Materials and methods Study design: 200 freshly extracted non-carious human molars were divided into 10 experimental groups according to the enamel pretreatment method: A air abrasion (Mach 4.1 Kreativ Inc., USA); AP, Air abrasion + conditioning with 20% polyacrylic acid (GC cavity conditioner); L, Er, Cr:YSGG laser application (Waterlase, Biolase Technology, Inc., San Clemente, USA); LP, Er, Cr: YSGG laser application and fissure conditioning; B, ameloplasty carried out with a diamond bur especially designed for preparing fissures (Komet #8833); BP, ameloplasty + fissure conditioning; P, application of 20% polyacrylic acid and all fissures sealed with GIC; C, no fissure treatment, the material was applied directly to the fissures (control); R, application of 37% orthophosphoric acid and fissures sealed with a resin-based sealant (Fissurit; Voco, Germany) (control); N, no treatment (control). Half of each group of teeth were left in artificial saliva for one month and the rest for three months. The teeth were then sectioned and microhardness was measured using a Vickers test apparatus. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Dunn's multiple comparison tests were carried out (5% significance). Results After one month results regarding hardness at the base and lateral walls of fissures were significantly higher in groups A, AP, L, LP, B, BP, P and C than in groups R and N (p<0.01), but no difference was seen between the treatment procedures. The results after three months produced similar findings with evenly increased values for all groups. Conclusion The results of this study showed that the tested GIC with a higher fluoride content seemed to improve the enamel hardness of the fissure enamel and could be regarded as an alternative material in cases where resin sealant applications are questionable.
dc.description.sponsorshipGC Corporation; Marmara University Scientific Researches CommitteeMarmara University [SAG-d-300609-0269]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by GC Corporation and Marmara University Scientific Researches Committee (Project No. SAG-d-300609-0269).
dc.identifier.endpage400
dc.identifier.issn1591-996X
dc.identifier.issn2035-648X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25517588
dc.identifier.startpage397
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/6150
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349608000013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorSözkes, Sarkis
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAriesdue Srl
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAir abrasion
dc.subjectFissure sealant
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cement (GIC)
dc.subjectLaser
dc.subjectMicrohardness
dc.subjectFissure Sealants
dc.subjectGlass-Ionomer
dc.subjectIn-Vitro
dc.subjectMicroleakage
dc.subjectCaries
dc.subjectPit
dc.subjectInhibition
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectSem
dc.titleMicrohardness evaluation of enamel adjacent to an improved GIC sealant after different enamel pre-treatment procedures
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
6150.pdf
Boyut:
472.69 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Çorlu Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu