Yazar "Argun, Burak" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Survival Outcomes of Treatment Modalities in Patients with Variant Histopathology of Bladder Cancer in First Transurethral Resection of the Bladder
    (2024) İzol, Volkan; Değer, Mutlu; Akdoğan, Bülent; Akgül, Murat; Aslan, Güven; Çelik, Serdar; Argun, Burak
    Objective: Diagnoses of variant histopathology (VH) in bladder cancer (BC) are increasing, and although there is a standard treatment algorithm for BC, the guidelines lack a standardized approach for treating VH in BC. We aimed to compare the survival results of the treatment algorithm applied to patients with BC with VH in the first transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR-B) procedure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed data on patients with VH of BC in the first TUR-B between January 2000 and January 2021. After the first TUR-B, we determined TUR-B+/- BCG, radical cystectomy (RC), and trimodal therapy (TMT) as the three potential treatments for patients according to the initial plans applied by the clinics. Results: A total of 289 patients with VH of BC in the first TUR-B were included in the study. Their mean age was 66.7±10.1 years, and most (246, 85.1%) were male. We found that TMT was associated with lower survival, and BCG administration offered no advantage in terms of overall survival (OS) or cancer specific survival (CSS) among patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In patients with MIBC, immediate RC provided a significant advantage over other treatment methods in terms of both OS and CSS. Conclusions: There is still no standard treatment for patients with VH of BC. Patients are less likely to survive TMT than other treatment modalities.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Survival Outcomes of Treatment Modalities in Patients with Variant Histopathology of Bladder Cancer in First Transurethral Resection of the Bladder
    (Galenos Publ House, 2024) Izol, Volkan; Deger, Mutlu; Akdogan, Buelent; Akguel, Murat; Aslan, Gueven; Celik, Serdar; Argun, Burak
    Objective: Diagnoses of variant histopathology (VH) in bladder cancer (BC) are increasing, and although there is a standard treatment algorithm for BC, the guidelines lack a standardized approach for treating VH in BC. We aimed to compare the survival results of the treatment algorithm applied to patients with BC with Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed data on patients with VH of BC in the first TUR-B between January 2000 and January 2021. After the first TUR-B, we determined TUR-B+/- BCG, radical cystectomy (RC), and trimodal therapy (TMT) as the three potential treatments for patients according to the initial Results: A total of 289 patients with VH of BC in the first TUR-B were included in the study. Their mean age was 66.7 +/- 10.1 years, and most (246, 85.1%) were male. We found that TMT was associated with lower survival, and BCG administration offered no advantage in terms of overall survival (OS) or cancer specific survival (CSS) among patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In patients with MIBC, immediate RC provided a significant advantage over other Conclusions: There is still no standard treatment for patients with VH of BC. Patients are less likely to survive TMT than other treatment modalities.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    The Effect of Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma
    (Karger, 2021) İzol, Volkan; Değer, Mutlu; Özden, Ender; Bolat, Deniz; Argun, Burak; Baltacı, Sümer; Bayazıt, Yıldırım; Akgül, Hacı Murat
    Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on intravesical recurrence (IVR), in patients with primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 354 patients, who underwent RNU for UTUC from 10 urology centers between 2005 and 2019, was performed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IVR after RNU. Patients were divided into URS prior to RNU (Group 1) and no URS prior to RNU (Group 2). Rates of IVR after RNU were compared, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate potential predictors of IVR. Results: After exclusion, a total of 194 patients were analyzed: Group 1 n = 95 (49.0%) and Group 2 n = 99 (51.0%). In Group 1, a tumor biopsy and histopathological confirmation during URS were performed in 58 (61.1%). The mean follow-up was 39.17 +/- 39.3 (range 12-250) months. In 54 (27.8%) patients, IVR was recorded after RNU, and the median recurrence time within the bladder was 10.0 (3-144) months. IVR rate was 38.9% in Group 1 versus 17.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.001). In Group 1, IVR rate was 43.1% in those undergoing intraoperative biopsy versus 32.4% of patients without biopsy during diagnostic URS (p =0.29). Intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS) was longer in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (median IRFS was 111 vs. 60 months in Groups 2 and 1, respectively (p< 0.001)). Univariate analysis revealed that IRFS was significantly associated with URS prior to RNU (HR: 2.9, 95% CI 1.65-5.41; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, URS prior to RNU (HR: 3.5, 95% CI 1.74-7.16; p < 0.001) was found to be an independent prognostic factor for IRFS. Conclusion: Diagnostic URS was associated with the poor IRFS following RNU for primary UTUC. The decision for a diagnostic URS with or without tumor biopsy should be reserved for cases where this information might influence further treatment decisions.