Irrigation scheduling of cool and warm season turfgrass irrigated with sub-drip irrigation method
Özet
The aim of this study is to determine the irrigation scheduling of cool-season and warm-season turfgrass species under sub-drip irrigation method. Field experiments were conducted in the experimental fields of Silivri municipality in Gümüsyaka village located between boundaries of Tekirdag and Istanbul, during the summer of the 2017. In the study, three different irrigation strategies were applied on cool season and warm season turfgrass species. Experimental design was split-plots in randomized blocks design with three replications. In the experimental area, Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) was used as a warm season turf type and a four-part mixture was used as cool season turf type (30% Lolium perenne, 25% Festuca rubra rubra, 35% Festuca arundinacea and 10% Poa pratensis). Irrigation water was applied when approximately 30%, 50%, and 70% of readily available water at effective root zone of 30 cm was consumed and completed to the field capacity. Irrigation scheduling was planned according to changes of available soil moisture level in root zone. At the end of the study for cool season turfgrass types; the total amount of irrigation water applied in different irrigation strategies varied between 324,2 mm - 195,7 mm, seasonal evapotranspiration values varied between 382,7 mm - 260,2 mm, and daily evapotranspiration values varied between 5,38 mm day-1 - 3,69 mm day-1. As for warm season turfgrass types; same values varied between 298,6 mm - 117,1 mm; 357,9 mm - 180,4 mm; and 5,03 mm day-1 - 2,53 mm day-1, respectively. In conclusion, the effect of different irrigation levels on two different turfgrasses have been determined to be statistically significant. When factors such as amount of irrigation water applied, cutting frequency and quality under the region's conditions are evaluated together; it is suggested to start irrigation when 50% of the available water in effective root zone is consumed in cool season turfgrass and when 70% is consumed in warm season turfgrass. When suggested aspects are compared, it can be said that warm season turfgrass demands 43% less irrigation water and consumes 52% less water than cool season turfgrass. Blaney-Criddle method was found to be the most suitable estimation method for reference evapotranspiration for cool and warm season turfgrass under the region's conditions and crop coefficient curves regarding these method were generated. © 2019 Namik Kemal University - Agricultural Faculty. All rights reserved.
Cilt
16Sayı
3Koleksiyonlar
İlgili Öğeler
Başlık, yazar, küratör ve konuya göre gösterilen ilgili öğeler.
-
Bodur Kiraz Bahçelerinde Dam la ve Mikro Yağmurlama Sulama Yöntemlerinin Yatırım ve İşletme Masraflan Yonunden Karşılaştırılması
Gültaş, Hüseyin Tevfik; Erdem, Yeşim (Ankara Univ, Fac Agr, 2007)Öz: Bu çalışmada, Tekirdağ Bağcılık Araştırma Enstitüsü arazisinde seçilen 27.3 da büyüklüğündeki bir kiraz bahçesinde, damla ve mikro yağmurlama sulama yöntemlerinin sulama suyu ihtiyacı, ilk tesis masrafı, yıllık işletme ... -
Çeltik (oryza sativa l. ) yetiştiriciliğinde bitki su tüketimi bileşenleri ile su üretim fonkdiyonlarının farklı sulama yöntemleri altında belirlenmesi
Özer, Selçuk (Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, 2019)Bu çalışmada, farklı sulama yöntemleri ile sulanan çeltik bitkisinin, verim ve verim bileşenlerinin ve su-üretim fonksiyonlarının belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla farklı sulama yöntemleri ile su düzeylerinin çeltik ... -
Trakya koşullarında farklı sulama yöntemleri altında ikinci ürün silajlık mısırın su üretim fonksiyonlarının belirlenmes
Okursoy, Hakan (Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, 2009)Tekirdağ koşullarında 2007-2008 yıllarında ikinci ürün silajlık mısır yetiştiriciliğinde, sulama yöntemlerinin ve farklı düzeylerdeki sulama suyu uygulamalarının verim, verim öğeleri, su – üretim fonksiyonları ve ekonomik ...