Upstaging of urothelial cancer at the time of radical cystectomy: factors associated with upstaging and its effect on outcome

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To analyse the details of bladder cancer (BC) staging in a large combined radical cystectomy (RC) database from two academic centres. To study rate and time trends, as well as risk factors for upstaging, especially clinical factors associated with staging errors after RC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Characteristics of patients undergoing RC at University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (1992-2010) and University of Turku, Turku, Finland (1986-2005) were analysed. RESULTS Among 602 patients undergoing RC, 306 (51%) had a discordance in clinical and pathological stages. Upstaging occurred in 240 (40%) patients and 192 (32%) patients were upstaged from organ-confined (OC) to non-organ-confined (nOC) disease. During the study period, upstaging became more common in both centres. In multivariate analyses, T2 disease at initial presentation (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] : 1.44-4.77), high grade disease (P = 0.01, OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.21-6.7), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P < 0.001, OR = 5.17, 95% CI: 3.48-7.68), female gender (P = 0.038, OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.38-0.97, and histological variants (P < 0.001, OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.6-4.8) were associated with a risk of upstaging from OC to nOC disease. Upstaged patients had worse survival rates than patients with correct staging. This was especially significant among patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle before undergoing RC (16% vs 46% 10-year disease-specific mortality, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Upstaging is a common problem and unfortunately no improvements have been observed during the last two decades. LVI and the presence of histological variants are strong predictors of upstaging at the time of RC. Pathologists should be encouraged to report LVI and any histological variant at the time of TURBT.