Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Onur
dc.contributor.authorGültekin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGücer Şahin, Gülcan
dc.contributor.authorErsözlü, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorArar, Makbule Cavidan
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T14:10:00Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T14:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1553-3506
dc.identifier.issn1553-3514
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15533506211059910
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11776/5245
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The cervical plexus block (CPB) has been used for a long time for both analgesia and anesthesia in carotid endarterectomy and thyroid operations. To be unfamiliar with the technique and its perceived difficulty, potential risks, and possible adverse effects such as intravascular injection has limited broader use before the practical use of ultrasound. We hypothesize that the cervical plexus block can provide adequate anesthesia in tracheostomy cases and provide excellent anesthesia comfort when combined with a translaryngeal block. Methods This double-blinded, randomized 29 patients undergoing primary tracheostomy operation to receive either CPB (Group S) or CPB with translaryngeal block (Group ST). The primary outcome was cumulated analgesic consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were as follows: pain related to incision, patient tolerance as assessed by tracheostomy cannula comfort score, cough and gag, pain at rest, nausea and vomiting, and time to first analgesic demand. Results The patient tolerance for tracheostomy was higher in Group ST than Group S. The median tracheostomy cannula comfort score was 4.0 in Group S. In contrast, the median score was significantly lower in group ST (P<.001). The cough and gag reflex scores were significantly lower in Group ST than Group S (1.0 vs 4.0, P<.001). Conclusion This trial supported the hypothesis that the CPB combined with the translaryngeal block yields excellent anesthesia for tracheostomies. The technique we briefly described, in a way, is the equivalent of awake fiberoptic intubation to awake tracheostomy with minimal sedation adjusted according to airway patency.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15533506211059910
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecttracheostomyen_US
dc.subjectcervical plexus blocken_US
dc.subjecttranslaryngeal blocken_US
dc.subjectregional anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectCarotid-Endarterectomyen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectAirwayen_US
dc.subjectBlocken_US
dc.titleCan Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Techniques For Tracheostomy Be An Alternative To General Anesthesia?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Innovationen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun ve Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0007-6315
dc.authorid0000-0003-4570-8339
dc.authorid0000-0002-3539-2353
dc.institutionauthorŞahin, Ayhan
dc.institutionauthorGültekin, Ahmet
dc.institutionauthorGücer Şahin, Gülcan
dc.institutionauthorErsözlü, Tolga
dc.institutionauthorArar, Makbule Cavidan
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidBaran, Onur/AAE-1881-2021
dc.authorwosidGültekin, Ahmet/ABA-7274-2020
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000730201100001en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34889150en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster